To: wideawake
Because Hill did not stop any children from being aborted, and there's no proof whatsoever that he did.
You are simply trying to spin some sort of moral relativity crap that holds one man responsible for murder, and the other not.
455 posted on
09/05/2003 11:48:41 AM PDT by
Luis Gonzalez
(There's no such thing as a stupid question, there are however, many inquisitive morons out there...)
To: Luis Gonzalez
Because Hill did not stop any children from being aborted, and there's no proof whatsoever that he did.Again, the results of an action have nothing to do with its morality or immorality.
You are simply trying to spin some sort of moral relativity crap that holds one man responsible for murder, and the other not.
You have used the words "spin" and "murder" several times now without answering the basic question: is using deadly force with the intent to save someone else's life murder? If so, why?
462 posted on
09/05/2003 11:56:17 AM PDT by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson