[wideawake]

Because Hill did not stop any children from being aborted, and there's no proof whatsoever that he did.

Again, the results of an action have nothing to do with its morality or immorality.

You are simply trying to spin some sort of moral relativity crap that holds one man responsible for murder, and the other not.

You have used the words "spin" and "murder" several times now without answering the basic question: is using deadly force with the intent to save someone else's life murder? If so, why?

[Luis Gonzalez]

"Using deadly force against someone who is about to murder someone is one thing, using deadly force against people who are not directly committing the act or physically preventing others from stopping the act is completely different."

The results of an action have nothing to do with its morality or immorality.

"Why is it permissible for Britton to kill people for cash while it is impermissible for Hill to kill to defend the lives of others?"

The results of an action have nothing to do with its morality or immorality.