[ladyinred]

but not everything should be about our own personal whims and narrow agendas.

I could not agree more with that statement. The rest of this, though well written and thought out, I am not yet sure. I don't think the Clinton impeachment statements are necessarily true, though I agree that it was wrong to make it all about Monica, I am not sure that was all Starr's fault. The media did a lot of that to help Clinton. The most important thing to me is that Davis is gone, and that Cruz does not take his place. I will vote accordingly, because NO ONE is more dangerous than those two.

[DrMartinVonNostrand]

Yeah, I probably went off on too much of a tangent with the Ken Starr bit, but I was trying to explain why pragmaticism and moderation sometimes is in your long term best interest to a bunch of reactionaries who can't grasp such a concept. I get the feeling like I have stumbled into the GOP's kennel here. It's like the polar opposite of MoveOn here with some of these characters. Scary.