To: DrMartinVonNostrand
but not everything should be about our own personal whims and narrow agendas.I could not agree more with that statement. The rest of this, though well written and thought out, I am not yet sure. I don't think the Clinton impeachment statements are necessarily true, though I agree that it was wrong to make it all about Monica, I am not sure that was all Starr's fault. The media did a lot of that to help Clinton. The most important thing to me is that Davis is gone, and that Cruz does not take his place. I will vote accordingly, because NO ONE is more dangerous than those two.
335 posted on
08/12/2003 6:21:23 PM PDT by
ladyinred
(The left have blood on their hands.)
To: ladyinred
Yeah, I probably went off on too much of a tangent with the Ken Starr bit, but I was trying to explain why pragmaticism and moderation sometimes is in your long term best interest to a bunch of reactionaries who can't grasp such a concept. I get the feeling like I have stumbled into the GOP's kennel here. It's like the polar opposite of MoveOn here with some of these characters. Scary.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson