Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I Am Now Behind Arnold
me

Posted on 08/12/2003 9:52:14 AM PDT by DrMartinVonNostrand

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 761-779 next last
To: Canticle_of_Deborah
one view from the opposition:

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/08/08/MN19612.DTL
541 posted on 08/12/2003 11:52:16 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: RS
Good to hear because the GOP platform supports background checks, which consequently leads to waiting periods. The platform also doesn't specifically define "arms" as include or exclude all types of guns. I'm just tired of folks slamming other Freepers as RINO's when they disagree with other people's values.

And yes, I believe strongly in that "big tent" even if fellow occupants want to tuck an Uzi with their Zoloft next to their sleeping bags :-)

542 posted on 08/12/2003 11:54:41 PM PDT by Tamzee (I was a vegetarian until I started leaning toward the sunlight...... Rita Rudner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 535 | View Replies]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
"- Think Clinton impeachment backlash. "

Baaad Statement -
..." oh I can't put Bill Clinton in jail because other countries will laugh at us"
..." oh I can't put Hillery in jail for all the illegal stuff she pulled in the White House because all the Dems will be mad at us "

Folks, we don't have to do ANYTHING to make them hate us and want to keep us out of power...

... If we don't get Davis out now, by electing anyone else... even Bustamonte, we will just have to fight him again later - stronger - and more secure -

The Goal now is Davis's career finished, if we get a Rep that can actually accomplish something, more to the good.

543 posted on 08/12/2003 11:55:44 PM PDT by RS (nc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 523 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
I've stated repeatedly that I support McClintock, but he just can't win.

So? It isn't true.

It isn't?
And how is McClintock going to overcome Bustamante's 12 point lead, let alone Arnold's 51% coalition of Republicans, Democrats, independents, and non-politicals?


Upon what basis do you lump Tom McClintock with Bill Simon, other than that they diverge from Ahnold?

Don't get me wrong, I think there is a world of difference between McClintock and Simon. Simon is a world-class loser and a bumbling idiot. Simon would bring ultimate death to the Republicans if he was elected. McClintock would not be nearly as bad of a reaction, but it would still create a backlash. Arnold is different because he is beloved by the people. He can't be painted as a partisan hack. If he won it would bring California together and Republicans would be off the hook for the recall. Anything else will surely bring voter anger and retribution.


Abortion (the ultimate red herring in a State election)?

Hey, at least we agree on something...

544 posted on 08/12/2003 11:57:08 PM PDT by DrMartinVonNostrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
I'd have popped in sooner, but was on the road and am still digging out. We drove from Seattle down to the Bay Area yesterday after a series of speaking engagements. It's getting better. One or two more of these and I'll have the core delivery of both the short and long programs worked out with the permutations to come.
545 posted on 08/12/2003 11:59:00 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/07/11/MN293799.DTL

A latina Republican to challenge "dumber than a box of rocks" Boxer...

could be some coattails to ride on for change in California....
546 posted on 08/12/2003 11:59:33 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 533 | View Replies]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
DrMartinVonNostrand said: "To read into it a free pass on any weapon is a grevious misinterpritation. "

I am not aware of any arms at the time the Constitution was written that were not protected by the Second Amendment. Our Founders did not foresee the invention of nuclear weapons but they did foresee the need to amend the Constitution. It has not been amended with regard to this matter.

The idea that our Founders would have tolerated a ban on a rifle because it has a bayonet lug is ludicrous.

547 posted on 08/12/2003 11:59:54 PM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: William Tell
Yep- Worse case, state goes bankrupt and all the bad deals and union contracts Davis signed get legally tossed

... or is that the Best case ?
548 posted on 08/13/2003 12:02:17 AM PDT by RS (nc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 540 | View Replies]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
McClintock would not be nearly as bad of a reaction, but it would still create a backlash.

Any cut in spending will create a backlash. Ahnold is too malleable to have the nards. Look how Maria and clan have changed his politics.

Arnold is different because he is beloved by the people. He can't be painted as a partisan hack.

Where do you guys get this stuff? It's easy to paint him as an inexperienced tool of wealthy Republican insiders and that's just what they'll do. Class envy works.

If he won it would bring California together and Republicans would be off the hook for the recall. Anything else will surely bring voter anger and retribution.

How do you get an eight inch brush to work on a keyboard? That kind of baseless claptrap will get you NOTHING among the professional class in Silicon Valley, Orange County, San Diego, or on the Peninsula (all high-turnout voters).

549 posted on 08/13/2003 12:05:08 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
"Legally there is nothing that stops the Government from regulating which arms are and aren't legal. The right to bear arms is quite narrow. "

Just when did the Government get the right to redefine the language ?

If this passed when I wasn't looking I guess they could do just about anything.

Depends what the meaning of IS is....
550 posted on 08/13/2003 12:08:07 AM PDT by RS (nc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
"I don't know much about him, but I'll probably vote for him," said Rafael Cortez of Oakland. "He seems like a good person, and the politics of this thing are really ugly. It would be great to have a Latino governor."

Frightening, and confirms my belief that many voters swim in the shallow end of the voter pool.

Latinos, about a third of the state's population, are on their way to becoming the majority in California, according to the U.S. Census. But very few Latinos vote. About 44 percent are immigrants, including many who never obtained citizenship, and millions of other Latinos are too young to vote.

AAARRGGGHHH!! Nor SHOULD they vote!

But I would rather have Cruz Bustamante than Gray Davis," said Sandoval, an Oakland resident who immigrated from Mexico in 1949. "And that movie star has a nice smile, but I wouldn't trust him further than I could throw him."

Smart man.

551 posted on 08/13/2003 12:09:06 AM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (The 12th Republican Commandment: "Thou shalt not alienate thy base")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 541 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Marin may be a good candidate. I need to learn a bit more about her. For some reason, I'm a little more tolerant of moderates/liberals for the Senate. I'm not crazy about her pro choice stance but if she is good on immigration **crossing my fingers** I'll take what I can get. Illegal immigration is the most immediate problem facing our state and nation IMO.
552 posted on 08/13/2003 12:18:13 AM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (The 12th Republican Commandment: "Thou shalt not alienate thy base")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: RS
Legally there is nothing that stops the Government from regulating which arms are and aren't legal.

I have a request:

Please keep saying things like that on FreeRepublic while you tout Arnold Schwartznegger. There's a reason Simon came up on Riordan fourteen points in a month and with more such penetrating analysis you'll help Tom McClintock do even better!

Got any more like that?

553 posted on 08/13/2003 12:19:17 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The environment is too complex and too important to be managed by politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand; Cyber Liberty; Chancellor Palpatine; nunya bidness; Torie; Carry_Okie; ...
For the record, I'm more convinced than I was back at #13 on this thread that you're a shill and a fraud.

You posted this thread under the pretense that you've "slowly come to the conclusion" that you are "now behind Arnold." That's a steaming pile of crap.

Your registered all of two days ago, and your first post ever was this thread was over here, Force Simon Out! Your first post was a thread? The day you registered?

Then you claim to have some dark night of the soul in less than 48 hours, on the same subject of the recall election, and you post your second thread? And you spend the entire day here preaching it like a new convert? Baloney.

You ain't no newbie, you've been here before, and you're playing dishonest games right now on Free Republic. You came here to post exactly this thread all along. Whether you're a professional (if so, you're overpaid) or an amateur, you're an operative with an agenda, and while you might fool some who want to believe that pap you're putting out, not everyone is so easily manipulated.

I might actually vote for Arnold Schwarzeneggar on October 7th, but it won't happen because of any of the gamesmanship and dissembling that you've ever done.


554 posted on 08/13/2003 12:22:58 AM PDT by Sabertooth (Where do Arnold and McClintock stand on California Drivers' Licenses for Illegal Aliens?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Good catch on the "Force Simon Out" thread. Very interesting.

Then you claim to have some dark night of the soul in less than 48 hours

LOL

Good to end the night with a laugh:-)

555 posted on 08/13/2003 12:27:14 AM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (The 12th Republican Commandment: "Thou shalt not alienate thy base")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
If my analysis is incorrect then explain why the courts routinely rule in accordance.

Simon came up on Riordan because Gray Davis spent millions in advertising to influence conservatives in the Republican primary.

The recall election is not a Republican primary.
Moderates cannot survive the primary and conservatives cannot survive the general election.

That's why there are not Republicans in statewide office right now.
I think you need to poke your head out of the bubble you're living in.
556 posted on 08/13/2003 12:29:52 AM PDT by DrMartinVonNostrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
You are correct, I am not a newbie to political thought.

And I very much have an agenda: to elect some Republicans in California for a change.
557 posted on 08/13/2003 12:33:23 AM PDT by DrMartinVonNostrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
One or two more of these and I'll have the core delivery of both the short and long programs worked out with the permutations to come.

As long as it doesn't keep you from your "yardwork" and all is well.

558 posted on 08/13/2003 12:34:03 AM PDT by nunya bidness (sic utere tuo ut alienum non laedas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: DrMartinVonNostrand
Simon came up on Riordan because Gray Davis spent millions in advertising to influence conservatives in the Republican primary.

Pop quiz for shills:

Why was Richard Riordan annointed by President Bush and Karl Rove, and whatever happened to Bill Jones, anyway?


559 posted on 08/13/2003 12:35:58 AM PDT by Sabertooth (Where do Arnold and McClintock stand on California Drivers' Licenses for Illegal Aliens?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

I don't need a forum to develop political thought. I'm not the sort to join a forum if I don't have something to say first.

It's laughable that you should think I a person needs to lurk on a forum before formulating their own opinion.
560 posted on 08/13/2003 12:36:29 AM PDT by DrMartinVonNostrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 521-540541-560561-580 ... 761-779 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson