If I recall correctly, at each stage of the agreement I was pleased with the progress we were making. The "troll calling" provision was a late addition, and when it began to be discussed, it became something I wanted, because I thought it was important. Before it became an issue, it didn't enter into my thinking.
Here is my memory:
------------
"For what it's worth, I'm willing to sign on to this. If it works, great. If it fails, it's been worth the effort."
134 posted on 07/31/2003 11:46 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
------------------------
"A-Girl, your newest draft is great. And I agree with jenny's most recent comments. Where do I sign?
369 posted on 08/03/2003 4:00 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (Felix, qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas.)
----------------
The 'troll' provision came later, as you said. But you were clearly acceptable prior.
My point is that from the outside, someone could just as easily see you as being devisive in your requirement for that provision, just as easily as you blame others who did the same from the other side.
It's all a matter of perspective.