To: Right Wing Professor
The philosophy of science came after science, not before it.
Doesn't "science" really just boil down to human observation/knowledge of phenomena? If so, how can it ever be detached from philosophy? If not, are you defining "science" as the actual phenomena itself, instead of its observation/etc.?
To: MitchellC
anarchist loon whack (( evo )) science placemaker !
3,935 posted on
07/17/2003 2:01:15 PM PDT by
f.Christian
(evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
To: MitchellC
Doesn't "science" really just boil down to human observation/knowledge of phenomena? If so, how can it ever be detached from philosophy When you were 9 months old, and noticed that when you cried, your mother appeared almost immediately, what was the philosophical basis of your actions?
To: MitchellC
This is why researchers rely on peer review. Because results must be reproduceable by other researchers, this process has a tendency to iron out any personal biases that may have creeped in. It ain't perfect, but it's darn close.
3,941 posted on
07/17/2003 2:06:11 PM PDT by
Junior
(Killed a six pack ... just to watch it die.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson