1) Do you believe that intoxicating substances which, when abused, cause societal problems and cause problems for persons in close proximity to abusers should be outlawed and that their use should be subject to criminal penalties?
2) If so, do you believe that such criminal penalties should be limited to those substances presently illegal, or should additional substances which meet the standard in #1 be added to the prohibition list (i.e. ecstacy in the 80s)?
3) If the former, why?
4) If the latter, can you think of anything not currently on the list that should be?
5) BONUS: Can you name an illegal intoxicating substance of which use was eradicated by making the substance illegal and aggresively pursuing criminal convictions of those who possessed it? How about substantially reduced?
Double bonus - what is a pro-job nut?
LOL, why waste the time, answering such silly drivel?
IOW "Why waste time thinking about the issue and actually using my brain,when instead I can post ignorant half-truths and inane remarks berating others on their views."