[commonerX]

People have to repeat the point to you because you can't support your arguement with rational answers. You can only use generalizations and labels. NEXT

[presidio9]

People have to repeat the point to you because you can't support your arguement with rational answers. You can only use generalizations and labels. NEXT

Not at all. My answers have been quite simple and entirely rational. I just enjoy hearing you guys hysterically explain how alcohol is so bad, but legalizing drugs will solve that problem. All of you amateur civil liberties lawyers keep trying to change the subject. Admittedly, I can't help addressing the fantastically moronic idea that kids will no longer have access to drugs when drugs are legal, but as for the rest, I'm not interested. All of you have yet to provide a compelling case for legalizing drugs. Next?

[presidio9]

Oh yeah, you want to know what else I like? The fact that every time one of you stoners ask the same "pithy" question that has been asked 1,000 times before (this is an old debate, my friend, there are NO new points) this thread gets bumped. It is a pain trying to keep up with the two handfuls of you who have made legalized drugs such an important issue in your lives (how pathetic is THAT?) but it is worth it to try. Why? Because no lurkers read 500 response threads that just keep repeating themselves. But they do read the article. And EVERY time you make your moronic point, and article titled "Ozzy Says He Now Believes Pot Leads To Other Addictions," gets bumped. So go for it.