Skip to comments.
Ozzy Says He Now Believes Pot Leads To Other Addictions
MTV ^
| 07.08.2003
| Robert Mancini, with reporting by Gideon Yago
Posted on 07/08/2003 2:31:17 PM PDT by presidio9
Ozzy Osbourne may have weathered the lowest lows that drug addiction has to offer, but the news that his son Jack was seeking treatment for substance abuse taught him a lesson that his own decades of addiction never did.
"I used to think they should legalize pot, but you know what? They should ban the lot," Osbourne told MTV News, addressing Jack's battle for the first time. "One thing leads to another. Coffee leads to Red Bull, Red Bull leads to crank.
"When I found out the full depth of him getting into OxyContin, which is like hillbilly heroin, I was shocked and stunned," Osbourne continued. "The thing that's amazing was how rapidly he went from smoking pot to doing hillbilly heroin."
Ozzy's son entered a California rehabilitation facility in April to battle what was later revealed to be an addiction to the prescription painkiller OxyContin (see "Jack Osbourne Reveals He Was Addicted To Painkiller OxyContin"). Jack also said that he was drinking and using a variety of substances including Vicodin, Valium, Xanax, Dilaudid, Lorcet, Lortab, Percocet and marijuana before his trip to rehab (see "Rehab Helps Jack Osbourne Get To Root Of Addiction Problems").
Jack's laundry list of controlled substances made his father painfully aware of just how readily available drugs are. "When I started doing drugs years ago, they were hard to get, but today it's everywhere," Osbourne said. "It's not just America. It's not just California. It's not just Beverly Hills. It's not just downtown New York. It's not just London. It's all over the world" (see "All About OxyContin, The Pills Known As 'Killers' ").
This relatively easy access to allegedly "controlled" substances is especially hard for Ozzy to swallow given his firsthand experience with the damage that drugs can do.
"I'm 55 years old, and I didn't get off scot-free," Osbourne explained. "I have to take medication for the rest of my life because I've done so much neurological damage to my body," Osbourne said.
We'll have much more from our interviews with Ozzy and Jack in an "MTV News Now" special report, premiering Tuesday at 11 p.m. ET/PT (Jack's complete interview will appear on MTVNews.com when the show premieres). The show will be followed the next day by a repeat of MTV News' "True Life: I'm Hooked on OxyContin" at 6:30 p.m.
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 1,661-1,662 next last
To: vin-one
Where I come from, pot is much easier for underage kids to obtain. Kids were getting stoned regularly in 7th grade. Drugs are much less bulky, and therefore easier to conceal. Next?
241
posted on
07/09/2003 7:37:16 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(RUN AL, RUN!!!)
To: presidio9
Okay. Let's start with your basic premise that just because some bad things are legal does not mean other bad things should be legal. Let's assume I buy into that. I don't, entirely, because I believe that some logical consistency in criminal prohibitions helps build respect for and compliance with the law. But I admit that is a bit of an amorphous concept, so I'll go with your view. With that as a given, can you articulate a reason, from a constitutional standpoint, why alcohol should be legal and pot should not? From a public health standpoint? From a medical standpoint? From a criminal justice standpoint?
Is there a single argument you would advance about why pot should be illegal that would not apply equally to alcohol? If so, what is it? If not, what is the reason you think it is a good idea for one to be legal and one not?
242
posted on
07/09/2003 7:38:20 AM PDT
by
lugsoul
To: MrLeRoy
What makes you think they aren't?
They'd be unable to refrain from hucking rocks at me. My orderly, conventional daily existence would threaten their hypothesis.
243
posted on
07/09/2003 7:38:26 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: presidio9; jayef
It is because of people who share your philosophy that abortion is legal.
That is astoundingly insulting, and you had best take it back, Mr. Man. What I choose to ingest, as a non-pregnant non-mother, harms no one.
To equate smoking a joint with killing a baby is cheap and base, and frankly something I would not expect to have found here.
Take it back now.
244
posted on
07/09/2003 7:40:04 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: Xenalyte
but I doubt you'll take the time to read something that disagrees with your slanted, teensy worldview. I have as much experience with drugs, their effects and the law enforcement associated with them as anyone else on this thread. But thanks for the grammar lesson. It is my experience that people on FR who can't think of anything relevant to say gravitate towards critiquing spelling, grammar, or (my personal favorite) "reading comprehension." I post for the lurkers. Committed Libertarians are not worth the effort.
245
posted on
07/09/2003 7:40:16 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(RUN AL, RUN!!!)
To: Xenalyte
We drug addled loonies have no control over ourselves, don't ya know? I mean, I might go schizophrenic at any moment here, like that dude in Meridian . . . oh wait, that was intollerance. Never mind.
246
posted on
07/09/2003 7:40:45 AM PDT
by
jayef
To: lugsoul
My suggestion to all of you wackos is that you leave alcohol out of the argument. No matter how you try to lasso it, it does not help your cause.
247
posted on
07/09/2003 7:41:52 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(RUN AL, RUN!!!)
To: Sir Gawain
How do you know? Are you a druggie? Have you tried to OD on weed? ;-)
A buddy of mine tried to do just that several years back. He consumed between an eighth and a quarter, and got so blasted he couldn't pick up the pipe anymore, but he felt just fine. Although he had quite the hankering for Taco Bell.
248
posted on
07/09/2003 7:42:23 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: ianincali
I know...if you don't agree with the Libertarians, they tear you a new one.There are actually very few members of the Libertarian Party on FR. The majority of us are Republicans who think the Drug War is a waste. Most of us ain't so bad though. It's good to have new people with opposing views aboard. If you're interested in these sort of threads, I have a ping list for drug war threads. IT averages 5-6 articles per day. Lemme know if you'd like to be on it.
249
posted on
07/09/2003 7:42:34 AM PDT
by
jmc813
To: Protagoras
Ozzy Osbourne, the new spokesman for the taliban wing of the Republican party. Predictable if nothing else. Um, this was posted by MTV.
250
posted on
07/09/2003 7:43:15 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(RUN AL, RUN!!!)
To: presidio9
pot is much easier for underage kids to obtain.
That is my point, if it were sold like alcohol it would be much harder for kids to get
the question was why is pot easier to get than booze
because booze is regulated and controled and sold in stores, the owner of the business stands
to lose out if caught selling to minors.
again logic, is something the Wod supporters lack..........
251
posted on
07/09/2003 7:43:16 AM PDT
by
vin-one
(I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
To: presidio9
Try this on for size. The reason minors can get pot with relative ease is that it is an ILLEGAL economy.
Where I grew up, alcohol sales were illegal. It was terribly easy for us high school kids to get alcohol, because those involved in selling alcohol were already breaking the law - if selling is already illegal, why not sell to kids? Across the river, where alcohol sales were legal, the kids had a terrible time buying it, because there was no illegal alcohol economy. They came over to our town to buy beer.
252
posted on
07/09/2003 7:43:17 AM PDT
by
lugsoul
To: ianincali
- The FBI reported that, nationwide, there were 695,201 marijuana arrests made in 1997 alone. Of these, 87% were for possession.
- Since 1965, there have been over 11 million marijuana arrests in the United States of America. The marijuana arrest rate right now is at an all time high.
- An estimated 37,000 marijuana prisoners are currently sitting in federal and state prisons and in local jails in the U.S.
Sources: FBI Uniform Crime Reports, Marijuana Policy Project
To: presidio9
I have as much experience with drugs, their effects and the law enforcement associated with them as anyone else on this thread. But thanks for the grammar lesson. It is my experience that people on FR who can't think of anything relevant to say gravitate towards critiquing spelling, grammar, or (my personal favorite) "reading comprehension." I post for the lurkers. Committed Libertarians are not worth the effort.
My arguments have continued beyond (and despite) your lack of grammatical skill, and I notice you don't mention visiting the thread I sent to you. Any reason for that?
254
posted on
07/09/2003 7:43:41 AM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
To: vin-one
Absolutely not. Pot is less bulky. If there were more around because it was legal, there would be more to sell to underage kids.
255
posted on
07/09/2003 7:44:34 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(RUN AL, RUN!!!)
To: Tall_Texan
And then, if you really make sense, they try to get you banned.The only drug warriors I recall getting banned were Illbay, who had a piss poor atitude on all threads, not just the drug ones, and FF578, who advocated executing gays. Do you know of any others?
256
posted on
07/09/2003 7:44:55 AM PDT
by
jmc813
To: Xenalyte
I notice you don't mention visiting the thread I sent to you. Any reason for that? I'm too busy explaining the real world to you confused stoners here.
257
posted on
07/09/2003 7:45:41 AM PDT
by
presidio9
(RUN AL, RUN!!!)
To: ianincali
Bottom Line: Drugs are illegal in the U.S. Do something illegal, go to jail. Don't like it, move!Do you have that same atitude towards "assault weapons"?
258
posted on
07/09/2003 7:45:50 AM PDT
by
jmc813
To: Xenalyte
Please don't indulge this crap. It's a strawman that these morons inject into this debate every chance they get. I absolutely refuse to deal with this idiotic line of reasoning anymore.
259
posted on
07/09/2003 7:45:56 AM PDT
by
jayef
To: Xenalyte
up to late last night and left off, a very big part of my post,
Wod supporters lack logic.....
made me look like a Wod supporter........
need much more coffee this morning.......
but ozzie says that will lead to crank......I'm doomed.......aaaiieeeeeee
260
posted on
07/09/2003 7:46:27 AM PDT
by
vin-one
(I wish i had something clever to put in this tag)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240, 241-260, 261-280 ... 1,661-1,662 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson