To: MeeknMing
As soon as she hit him she had a duty to stop. Being intoxicated while committing a crime should be an aggravating circumstance not any kind of excuse the sole exception to that rule is when someone is forcibly goven intoxixcants or given them without their knowledge.
4 posted on
06/23/2003 2:56:04 PM PDT by
harpseal
(Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
To: harpseal
smoked pot, took ecstasy and drank heavily What are the symptoms of someone under the influence of ecstasy?
12 posted on
06/23/2003 3:02:18 PM PDT by
csvset
To: harpseal
If she gets off with this defense it will become the standard defense for all DWIs. "It wasn't my fault that I was driving drunk, I was drunk."
To: harpseal
Being drugged is an aggravating circumstance.
"Mallard did stop briefly to try and get Biggs off her car, but when she couldn't, she drove about a mile to her home, Jack said."
And no one saw this?
65 posted on
06/23/2003 3:45:46 PM PDT by
cinFLA
To: harpseal
As soon as she hit him she had a duty to stop. Being intoxicated while committing a crime should be an aggravating circumstance not any kind of excuse... This is especially true if you're a bishop.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson