Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: MeeknMing
As soon as she hit him she had a duty to stop. Being intoxicated while committing a crime should be an aggravating circumstance not any kind of excuse the sole exception to that rule is when someone is forcibly goven intoxixcants or given them without their knowledge.
4 posted on 06/23/2003 2:56:04 PM PDT by harpseal (Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: harpseal
smoked pot, took ecstasy and drank heavily

What are the symptoms of someone under the influence of ecstasy?

12 posted on 06/23/2003 3:02:18 PM PDT by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal
If she gets off with this defense it will become the standard defense for all DWIs. "It wasn't my fault that I was driving drunk, I was drunk."
21 posted on 06/23/2003 3:11:20 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal
Being drugged is an aggravating circumstance.

"Mallard did stop briefly to try and get Biggs off her car, but when she couldn't, she drove about a mile to her home, Jack said."

And no one saw this?
65 posted on 06/23/2003 3:45:46 PM PDT by cinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal
As soon as she hit him she had a duty to stop. Being intoxicated while committing a crime should be an aggravating circumstance not any kind of excuse...

This is especially true if you're a bishop.

174 posted on 06/23/2003 9:25:55 PM PDT by BlazingArizona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson