To: js1138
The level of discourse does seem to have degenerated sharply. It is also interesting to see that the factoids usually tossed out to rebut evolution (moon dust, dino/man tracks, seawater salinity, etc.) have been reduced of late to a monolitic "no evidence" argument. Shouting "no evidence" over and over (even in the face of evidence) seems preferable these days to having your favorite anti-evolution silver bullet jam in the magazine again.
There has, however, been one entertaining aspect to these recent threads -- the development of alternatives to the worn out epithet "evilutionist". ALS and ApesForEvolution have contributed on this thread alone: crap religion; crap theory; evotards; evolunacy; e-loons; evo-mantra; evo-lie; and convolutionists. Granted, this seems to be all they've contributed, but the bar ain't real high with these folks, so let's give credit where credit is due.
606 posted on
06/23/2003 1:46:00 PM PDT by
atlaw
To: atlaw
There has, however, been one entertaining aspect to these recent threads -- the development of alternatives to the worn out epithet "evilutionist". ALS and ApesForEvolution have contributed on this thread alone: crap religion; crap theory; evotards; evolunacy; e-loons; evo-mantra; evo-lie; and convolutionists. Granted, this seems to be all they've contributed, but the bar ain't real high with these folks, so let's give credit where credit is due. BWHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!
612 posted on
06/23/2003 2:04:25 PM PDT by
balrog666
(When in doubt, tell the truth. - Mark Twain)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson