Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Arkie2
Yep, science should be taught in the science class, NOT religious dogma.
6 posted on 06/22/2003 5:42:00 PM PDT by Aric2000 (If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Aric2000
I agree. If I want religious dogma, I'll go to bible class. If I want science, I'll attend my lectures. And never the twain shall meet.
19 posted on 06/22/2003 5:57:06 PM PDT by Beaker (Toto! Have you been chewing on my slippers again?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Aric2000
Yep, science should be taught in the science class, NOT religious dogma.

Unfortunately evolution doesn't even qualify as a true science.

A definition of science given by the Oxford Dictionary is:
"A branch of study which is concerned either with a connected body of demonstrated truths or with observed facts systematically classified and more or less colligated by being brought under general laws, and which includes trustworthy methods for the discovery of new truths within its own domain."

Evolution fails to meet the criteria of being a true science.
Evolution has never been observed by anyone... and evolutionist themselves admit no transitional forms have been observed in the fossil record.
Evolution has never been demonstrated in a laboratory.

Though it is rather funny that all these supposedly "highly educated" men would spend so much time trying to cause something to "evolve" and create even the most basic form of life..JUST to prove to us that it *took no higher intelligence to create life.

22 posted on 06/22/2003 5:58:58 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Aric2000
Yep, science should be taught in the science class, NOT religious dogma

So when are they going to kick evolutiomn out of the classroom.

504 posted on 06/22/2003 11:25:31 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: Aric2000
Until science can prove the existence of nothing, then all science can be used to equally prove what would appear as opposites in the same conclusion. Science has proven that all creation has a creator. Until they prove otherwise, they will continue down the eternal road of trying to prove a negative: that God does not exist. What they will find, however, if the eternities give them sufficient time to discover it, is the surface area of a toenail of what us religionists respectfully phrase as and bow to is the very feet of GOD.

O the irony of scientists studying the creations with the determination to show that God does not exist

As compared to the religionist who studies the very character of the Creator of all this.

1,202 posted on 06/29/2003 4:24:00 PM PDT by Arrowhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson