Replies

Until science can prove the existence of nothing, then all science can be used to equally prove what would appear as opposites in the same conclusion. Science has proven that all creation has a creator. Until they prove otherwise, they will continue down the eternal road of trying to prove a negative: that God does not exist. What they will find, however, if the eternities give them sufficient time to discover it, is the surface area of a toenail of what us religionists respectfully phrase as and bow to is the very feet of GOD.

O the irony of scientists studying the creations with the determination to show that God does not exist

As compared to the religionist who studies the very character of the Creator of all this.

Are you really this way? Or do you just play this on the internet?

Science can NEITHER PROVE NOR DISPROVE the existence of god, therefore science CANNOT use god as a causation.

What? The fact that the sun is the center of the solar system, somehow disproves the existence of god?

The discovery of DNA somehow disproves the existence of god? The discovery of transitional fossils somehow disproves the existence of god?

Get a clue, science does NOT USE god, because it cannot prove nore disprove the existence of god.

Get over yourself already.