[Aric2000]

Are you really this way? Or do you just play this on the internet?

Science can NEITHER PROVE NOR DISPROVE the existence of god, therefore science CANNOT use god as a causation.

What? The fact that the sun is the center of the solar system, somehow disproves the existence of god?

The discovery of DNA somehow disproves the existence of god? The discovery of transitional fossils somehow disproves the existence of god?

Get a clue, science does NOT USE god, because it cannot prove nore disprove the existence of god.

Get over yourself already.

[Arrowhead]

Well, DUUUUHHHH. Of course science does not "use god." How can it use something that it does not believe in? Better question: How can it use something that it tries to disprove?

If you are anything of a scientist (probably a wanna-be), then you should be able to understand the SIMPLE logic purported here.

Do not pretend that you do not know that scientists conclusions that no God exists until it can be proven is not behind a motivating design in their discovery? If you deny this, then you are just plain stupid and not worth my time debating.

But, just to settle this crazy dialogue once and for all: God exists because I have seen him. While yeh-whos like yourself thrive on the empirical being based on what you see, smell, etc., then perhaps you could find a small place in that small heart of yours to believe me. But, hey, what do I know? I am only one in thousands who have seen Deity. Yet if he cannot be place flat out on a piece of glass underneath a microscope, then you absolutely refuse to believe it. Well, tough titty said the kitty, but your mind is just too sour. tah tah

Arrowhead-------know-it-all-scientists--->