[Aric2000]

What do scientists think of all this? We have great problems with the claim that ID is a scientific theory or a science-based alternative to evolutionary theory. We don't question its religious or philosophical underpinnings. That's not our business. But there is no scientific evidence underlying ID theory.

No relevant research has been done; no papers have been published in scientific journals. Because it has no science base, we believe that ID theory should be excluded from science curricula in schools.



Read ALS, the problem will soon be clear, but I see that you did NOT read it, just spouting off again.

Oh well, why am I NOT surprised.

[ALS]

"we"

You keep spewing like you're a scientist.
You aren't, so get off that rag mop pony.

You fear alternative theories. Evolutionists don't even like scientific criticism of evolution taught in schools, eventhough the criticism is brought forth by fellow scientists.

If your crap theory is so true, what's to fear?

Let the total evidence be the judge. If we wanted totalitarinism to reign free in our schools we'd all be voting for Swillary in 2004.

[shhrubbery!]

But there is no scientific evidence underlying ID theory

There's no scientific evidence underlying macro-evolutionary theory. Unless you count Piltdown Man.