Skip to comments.
'Intelligent design' theory threatens science classrooms
Seattle Post Intelligencer ^
| 11/22/2002
| ALAN I. LESHNER
Posted on 06/22/2003 5:29:39 PM PDT by Aric2000
In Cobb County, Ga., controversy erupted this spring when school board officials decided to affix "disclaimer stickers" to science textbooks, alerting students that "evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things."
The stickers were the Cobb County District School Board's response to intelligent design theory, which holds that the complexity of DNA and the diversity of life forms on our planet and beyond can be explained only by an extra-natural intelligent agent. The ID movement -- reminiscent of creationism but more nuanced and harder to label -- has been quietly gaining momentum in a number of states for several years, especially Georgia and Ohio.
Stickers on textbooks are only the latest evidence of the ID movement's successes to date, though Cobb County officials did soften their position somewhat in September following a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Georgia. In a subsequent policy statement, officials said the biological theory of evolution is a "disputed view" that must be "balanced" in the classroom, taking into account other, religious teachings.
Surely, few would begrudge ID advocates their views or the right to discuss the concept as part of religious studies. At issue, rather, is whether ID theory, so far unproven by scientific facts, should be served to students on the same platter with the well-supported theory of evolution.
How the Cobb County episode will affect science students remains uncertain since, as the National Center for Science Education noted, the amended policy statement included "mixed signals."
But it's clear that the ID movement is quickly emerging as one of the more significant threats to U.S. science education, fueled by a sophisticated marketing campaign based on a three-pronged penetration of the scientific community, educators and the general public.
In Ohio, the state's education board on Oct. 14 passed a unanimous though preliminary vote to keep ID theory out of the state's science classrooms. But the board's ruling left the door open for local school districts to present ID theory together with science and suggested that scientists should "continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory."
In fact, even while the state-level debate continued, the Patrick Henry Local School District, based in Columbus, passed a motion this June to support "the idea of intelligent design being included as appropriate in classroom discussions in addition to other scientific theories."
Undaunted by tens of thousands of e-mails it has already received on the topic, the state's education board is now gamely inviting further public comment through November. In December, Ohio's Board of Education will vote to conclusively determine whether alternatives to evolution should be included in new guidelines that spell out what students need to know about science at different grade levels.
Meanwhile, ID theorists reportedly have been active in Missouri, Kansas, New Mexico, New Jersey and other states as well as Ohio and Georgia.
What do scientists think of all this? We have great problems with the claim that ID is a scientific theory or a science-based alternative to evolutionary theory. We don't question its religious or philosophical underpinnings. That's not our business. But there is no scientific evidence underlying ID theory.
No relevant research has been done; no papers have been published in scientific journals. Because it has no science base, we believe that ID theory should be excluded from science curricula in schools.
In fact, the Board of Directors of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), the largest general scientific society in the world, passed a resolution this month urging policy-makers to keep intelligent design theory out of U.S. science classrooms.
Noting that the United States has promised to "leave no child behind," the AAAS Board found that intelligent design theory -- if presented within science courses as factually based -- is likely to confuse American schoolchildren and undermine the integrity of U.S. science education. At a time when standards-based learning and performance assessments are paramount, children would be better served by keeping scientific information separate from religious concepts.
Certainly, American society supports and encourages a broad range of viewpoints and the scientific community is no exception. While this diversity enriches the educational experience for students, science and conceptual belief systems should not be co-mingled, as ID proponents have repeatedly proposed.
The ID argument that random mutations in nature and natural selection, for example, are too complex for scientific explanation is an interesting -- and for some, highly compelling -- philosophical or theological concept. Unfortunately, it's being put forth as a scientifically based alternative to the theory of biological evolution, and it isn't based on science. In sum, there's no data to back it up, and no way of scientifically testing the validity of the ideas proposed by ID advocates.
The quality of U.S. science education is at stake here. We live in an era when science and technology are central to every issue facing our society -- individual and national security, health care, economic prosperity, employment opportunities.
Children who lack an appropriate grounding in science and mathematics, and who can't discriminate what is and isn't evidence, are doomed to lag behind their well-educated counterparts. America's science classrooms are certainly no place to mix church and state.
Alan I. Leshner is CEO of the American Association for the Advancement of Science and executive publisher of the journal Science; www.aaas.org
TOPICS: Heated Discussion
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 1,201-1,219 next last
To: Aric2000
"I am very happy with my beliefs, I just don't believe that they are right for anyone else"
How do you know? Maybe we could learn a thing or three.
Does your god do anything in particular?
401
posted on
06/22/2003 9:47:22 PM PDT
by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.conservababes.com)
To: Aric2000
Well I guess you told me huh? Everything except what you believe that is.
To: ApesForEvolution
Can you boil them down for me? Kind of like "Astrophysics for Dummies"? Seriously, astrophysics piqued my interest and I sincerely would like a "Cliff's Notes" version if you would indulge me.This site is an excellent start. :-) I truly am glad you are interested. It will give you a much greater understanding than I could in just a few paragraphs:
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_01.htm
To: sonsofliberty2000
So, if God isn't bigger than our brains; then God He must not be?
404
posted on
06/22/2003 9:50:06 PM PDT
by
ApesForEvolution
("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
To: JesseShurun
I have no idea what that is, I have never even heard of it, besides remembering the name long enough to claim to be a part of it, sorry, but you lose... LOL
What the heck does that mean anyway? Prophets church, Universal and triumphant? what the heck is that? Seriously, what the heck does that mean?
405
posted on
06/22/2003 9:50:21 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: goodseedhomeschool
I lived in Turkey actually, for 18 months while I was in the Army.
406
posted on
06/22/2003 9:51:05 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: RadioAstronomer
Thanks. I'll partake this week.
I'm a fan of science...it's the junk science I have no more time for.
407
posted on
06/22/2003 9:51:34 PM PDT
by
ApesForEvolution
("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
To: RadioAstronomer
It would be informative to me if you found actual errors in my astronomy posts.On your astronomy posts I have found no problems. However with the next sentence in your post I have a problem:
The caveat is that it must be from a peer-reviewed source such as "THE ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL", not some unsubstantiated statements from a creationist (or other) web site.
Considering that the present article was written by the editor of an evolutionist peer-reviewed magazine, the request by evolutionists that contrary statements be backed up by such is pretty meaningless. Clearly there is lots of drivel in such journals and very biased ones at that as this article and a recent article by the editor of Scientific American shows. Anyways, science is about facts not degrees or where it is published.
408
posted on
06/22/2003 9:51:39 PM PDT
by
gore3000
(Intelligent people do not believe in evolution.)
To: Aric2000
Summit Lighthouse or Summit University.
HISTORY
An offshoot of an offshoot of a modified theology is the best way to begin to understand the historical analysis of the Church Universal and Triumphant (CUT). In the 1930's Guy and Edna Ballard drew from sources such as Helena Petrovna Blavatsky's Theosophy, the writings of Baird Spalding and William D. Pelley as well as from their own inspiration. This resulted in an eclectic approach which the Ballards called the I AM.
Breaking away from the I AM, Thomas Printz, in 1954, founded the Bridge to Freedom. This group taught much of the same theology as the I AM, including the need for followers to "purge the soul of karma, the consequences of evil done in former incarnations. To accomplish this end, students invoke the Divine Presence `I AM' through decree, rhythmic breathing and monthly Transmission Flame Classes, when the power of a particular ascended master is avaiable" (Encyclopedia of American Religions, Vol. 2, p. 159).
Born in December 1918, Mark Prophet began receiving revelations at the age of 18 from what he would later call the Great White Brotherhood. Elizabeth Clare Wulf was born in April 1940 and rejected traditional Christianity early in her life as well. Being former members of the Bridge to Freedom, they met in 1961 at Boston University and began studying the mystical teachings of these ascended masters.
From this initial meeting the Church Universal and Triumphant grew. CUT's headquarters would move several times, including stays in Colorado and California. In 1973 Mark Prophet suffered a fatal stroke. As with any group basing its teachings on a single instructor, when the leader dies there is a sudden vacuum.
As Robert Burrows writes, "After Mark Prophet's death in 1973, Elizabeth had to contend with a number of staff who began receiving dictations, thus threatening to undermine her authority as the Great White Brotherhood's sole representative. The threat was averted through a number of timely dictations from key ascended masters who condemned Elizabeth's rivals as false prophets" (Church Universal and Triumphant:The Summit Lighthouse, SCP, 1984).
With her position now firmly secured, Elizabeth Clare Prophet (Guru Ma and World Mother), was ready to move CUT forward into its next phase Camelot! This campus, formerly Claretville Seminary in Santa Monica, had become "today's thrust of the Great White Brotherhood" and therefore her thrust (Chamelot:A Thrust for a Purpose, p. 6). It would, according to Prophet, "open (the) door of salvation for millions of souls." At Camelot, "the chela's own ascension into the I AM THAT I AM" could be obtained (Ibid.).
The only thing that stood in their way was finances. In 1978, CUT sent a booklet to its chelas. After describing the glories of Camelot, the bottom line was given. That bottom line was a $7 million need by July 1980 (Ibid, p. 33). It was a goal that was never to be met.
After several other problems, CUT moved to its present location near Corwin Springs, Montana next to Yellowstone National Park. However, even in this secluded area, CUT still had troubles. One problem was Prophet's predictions of a coming holocaust which would result in the need for bomb-shelters and weapons.
"Church officials and members won't say much about the bomb-shelter project, but CUT's copy-righted publication Pearls of Wisdom says the Soviet Union is getting set to launch a first-strike nuclear attack on the United States and church members should `prepare to survive underground'" (Missoula, MT Missoulian, 7 May 1989). In preparation for this catastrophe, CUT built several underground shelters. These shelters have resulted in court injunction by Federal authorities due to their environmental impact (The Billings Gazette, 19 January 1991, p. 4-B).
CUT encountered further tensions due to their weapons build up. "The Church Universal and Triumphant has been keeping stockpiles of weapons as far back as 1974, claims a former CUT member who says he once hauled a load of guns and ammunition to Montana for the church" (Bozeman, MT Daily Chronicle, 12 July 1989). These weapons included "several military-type weapons," some ".50-caliber assault rifles, several other military weapons, (and) 120,000 rounds of ammunition" (Ibid).
Prophet most recently made national news with statements which many chelas believed signaled nuclear war on 23 April 1990 (New York Times, 15 March 1990). Two to three thousand followers flocked to the fall-out shelters in Montana.
DOCTRINE
TRINITY: According to Mark Prophet, "When we speak of the Creator and His Consciousness, we must include in our awareness the concept of the Father-Mother God, of a Being that is both masculine and feminine in nature, whose oneness is found in the perfect balance of the energies of Spirit and Matter. If God is Father-Mother, what, then, is the Trinity? When we refer to God the Father, God the Son, and God as Holy Spirit, we are actually referring to God as He is found in Spirit and in Matter, thus recognizing that His Being and Consciousness appears in the Persons of the Trinity according to the level or plane in individual awareness (Climb the Highest Mountain, p. 321).
Simply stated, CUT's doctrine of the Trinity is "All of life is God. All of being is God. all of consciousness is God" (Cosmic Consciousness, p. 29).
GOD THE FATHER: Mark Prophet went on to write, "God in the Person of Father includes the Mother principle, for He is forever the Androgynous Whole" (Climb the Highest Mountain, pp. 321-322).
GOD THE SON:CUT makes a distinction between Jesus the man and the impersonal Christ consciousness. In The Lost Teachings of Jesus the Prophets explain, "Jesus was both the actual and symbolical representative of this Christ Self. Jesus was the example, the one who self-realized the Christ Mind and was at one with it at all times. Jesus himself was not the only begotten Son of the Father. The Christ of him was and is the only begotten Son of the Father; and Jesus was the pure vessel of that Universal One. He was the One Sent, chosen from among the Sons of heaven to embody the Christ on earth as the avatar, the exemplar for all to follow for the two-thousand-year Picean cycle" (p. 241).
GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT: The Holy Spirit is seen by CUT as an impersonal essence or force. Mark Prophet declared, "The essence of the Holy Spirit is dispersed throughout Cosmos as vastness of creative potential that can be measured only in light-years. The Holy Spirit is the energy man uses either to expand Good or to expand an energy veil" (Climb the Highest Mountain, p. 132).
MAN'S DESTINY: Through the various I AM Flame ceremonies, the chelas are to realize their own Christ consciousness, thereby becoming one with the ascended masters. Mark Prophet, quoting one of these masters, explains, "To make you one with us in all planes of being is the goal of our communication. And our love for evolving humanity is so great that if it were possible, we would lay down our very life for the salvation of all" (Cosmic Consciousness, p. 31).
Even Jesus could not overcome the cosmic law of Karma. Mark Prophet explains, "God the Father did not require the sacrifice of his son Christ Jesus, or of any other incarnation of the Christ, as an atonement for the sins of the world; nor is it possible according to cosmic law for any man's sacrifice to balance either the original sin or the subsequent sins - the karma - of the one or the many" (Science of the Spoken Word, p. 87).
Other Doctrines
1) The Ascended Masters are a group of spiritual leaders, including, but not restricted to: Jesus, Buddha, El Morya, Saint Germain and Mark Prophet. How does one become an ascended master? Mark and Elizabeth Clare Prophet explained Saint Germain's journey. "Saint Germain said that his salvation, his ascension whereby he became an Ascended Master, was the result of two million right decisions that he made. Now, if you stop and think about that from a mathematical standpoint, you will see that it would take a man quite a few lifetimes to make two million right decisions" (The Lost Teachings of Jesus, p. 138).
2) Reincarnation is a central doctrine for CUT. Its necessity is explained in a passage by Elizabeth Clare Prophet in which she is speaking about Jesus' titles Son of Man and Son of David. She states, "Both refer to the soul (solar) identity that reincarnates again and again until it reunites with the individual Christ Self, referred to in much of the Old Testament scripture as Adonai, meaning `Lord,' or `Master.'
"The Christ Self, then, has communication with the Father who in both Principle and Person is the Presence of God, the I AM THAT I AM, or the I AM Presence. Thus we find that the soul of David, endued by the Holy Ghost, addressed his own Christ Self, the archetype of the Messiah, and received of him the report that God the Father, his own beloved I AM Presence, had addressed his own Christ Self, saying `Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool'" (Mysteries of the Holy Grail: Archangel Gabriel, p. 217).
3) The Bible is not believed to contain all the teachings of Jesus, hence the need for modern instructions from the ascended masters.
4) Law of Karma is the cycle of good/evil which must be worked through during endless reincarnations.
5) The I AM Flame ceremonies consist of seemingly endless monotone chants and rhythmic breathing for the purpose of gaining Christ consciousness. Through these ceremonies, Prophet teaches, each chela can find their own Christ Self which can in turn communicate with their Divine I AM Presence (as was discussed in the reincarnation section above).
BIBLICAL RESPONSE
1) God is not all, He is separate from creation (Gen. 1:1, John 1:3, Col. 1:16). God is never referred to as a "Mother."
2) Jesus is Christ at birth, not obtained later in life (Matt. 1:23, Luke 2:11). Jesus is the only begotten (John 1:14-18, 3:16-18).
3) The Holy Spirit is not an impersonal essence, but is a personal being (John 16:13-14, Acts 5:3, 13:2).
4) Man's sinful nature is forgiven only through Jesus atonement (Acts 4:12, Rom. 3:25-26, 1 John 2:2).
5) Reincarnation is false (Hebrews 9:27).
RESOURCES
1) New Age Movement: Space Age Heresy. This Watchman Fellowship documentation guide and cassette tape provides an overview of the New Age movement. While CUT is not directly mentioned, many of its doctrines (e.g. Karma, Reincarnation, etc.) are discussed. $8.00
2) The Lure of the Cults, Ronald Enroth. This 140 page book mentions CUT and some of its teachings. It is indexed and well documented. Discusses related topics to CUT. Soft back, $6.00.
3) Cult Watch: What You Need To Know About Spiritual Deception, John Ankerberg and John Weldon. This 378 page book has a brief mention of CUT. However it does discuss several of CUT's doctrines as they appear in other groups. Indexed, soft back, $13.00.
Profile is a regular feature of the Watchman Expositor published by Watchman Fellowship, Inc. Readers are encouraged to begin their own religious research notebooks using these articles. Back issues of Profile are made available at a nominal fee. Resource items are subject to changes in availability
409
posted on
06/22/2003 9:51:51 PM PDT
by
JesseShurun
(The Hazzardous Duke)
To: JesseShurun
Sorry, But I'm NOT new age anything, but again, nice try...
410
posted on
06/22/2003 9:52:17 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
I have always wanted to visit Turkey. I bet it was interesting. I would love to travel the world one day.
To: Aric2000
ex Catholic, but not a Christian tho, right?
412
posted on
06/22/2003 9:53:55 PM PDT
by
JesseShurun
(The Hazzardous Duke)
To: JesseShurun
Whoa, well thank you, sounds a little too esoteric for me.
An offshoot of an offshoot, and all that stuff.
Sounds fascinating for study, but not somthing that I would be interested in, but thanks for sharing that, learn something new everyday.
413
posted on
06/22/2003 9:55:37 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
WoW!!! Did you invent your own faith which is only self-evident to YOU and no one else can know about it?
You didn't find out that you are the One, did you?
414
posted on
06/22/2003 9:56:05 PM PDT
by
ApesForEvolution
("The only way evil triumphs is if good men do nothing" E. Burke)
To: JesseShurun
He is stubborn about telling us to be sure. I won't be able to sleep tonight just trying to fugure it out.
To: ApesForEvolution
416
posted on
06/22/2003 9:57:10 PM PDT
by
ALS
(http://designeduniverse.conservababes.com)
To: ALS
LOL stop it I nearly wet myself. :)
To: goodseedhomeschool
Turkey was great fun, Got to go and see Ephesus, Greece, took a trip to Israel, swam in the dead sea, got to see Bethelehem, the mount, it was great.
Got to tour ALL of the old Mosques in Istanbul, traveled throughout Europe, fell asleep on a bus from Istanbul and ended up on the Bulgarian border with a machine gun in my face.
It was fascinating, hair raising, adrenaline pumping, and I would not trade it for the world.
418
posted on
06/22/2003 9:58:25 PM PDT
by
Aric2000
(If the history of science shows us anything, it is that we get nowhere by labeling our ignorance god)
To: Aric2000
rwp ...
"That's a historical accident, dating from when science was known as natural philosophy. It's an anachronism. As science has progressed, and philosophy has vortexed down into its own navel, the idea that philosophy somehow includes science is ever more untenable."
"Hardly any science textbook at the college level even mentions philosophy. Virtually no published scientific papers cite a single philosophical reference. Not much of a cornerstone."
fC ...
Anarchy <== undernatural speculation - DENIAL - knowledge (( philosophy )) - technology // SCIENCE ==> design !
Evolution is groundless -- no philosophical or technical foundation !
rwp (( my additions )) ...
As EVOLUTION * * (( science )) has progressed,
and philosophy (( science // civilization )) * * has vortexed down into its own navel,
the idea that philosophy somehow ... EXCLUDES * * --- (( includes )) science
is ever more untenable.
... * * ... my additions !
419
posted on
06/22/2003 9:59:17 PM PDT
by
f.Christian
(( I'm going to rechristen evolution, in honor of f.Christian, "shlockology"... HumanaeVitae ))
To: Aric2000
INTREP
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400, 401-420, 421-440 ... 1,201-1,219 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson