[Dimensio]

Now kindly tell me where in the above evolution allows for God.

Evolution does not claim that no divine entites are involved in the shifting of alelle frequencies. It is also silent on the ultimate cause of environmental changes that may create selective pressures. As such, a "God" could be inserted into either of these variables (and other variables as well). Therefore, your entire premise is exposed as false. Since you've had this explanation given to you before, the only conclusion that I can draw from you bringing it up again is that you are a shameless liar. Of course, you've openly quoted others out of context in the past, so your current dishonesty is not at all surprising.

[Aric2000]

That is why most of just ignore him.

His posts are full of assertions that have been proven patently ridiculous, and full of lies and innuendo that he has no basis for.

But, no matter how many times he is refuted, he switches to a new thread and plays the same old record over again.

Yes, He is a liar and a charlatan, claiming to know about science when in fact he is obviously clueless.

The other creationists have learned well from him.

If the statement is true, and they don't like it, then they misquote it, misrepresent it, or out and out lie about it.

All's fair to a zealot I guess.

Facts don't get in the way of their agenda. scientific evidence to the contrary of creationism and their frequent rants are ignored, or lied about.

It is the way of the creationist, because lying about science isn't REALLY lying, right?

[gore3000]

Now kindly tell me where in the above evolution allows for God. -me- Evolution does not claim that no divine entites are involved in the shifting of alelle frequencies.

Nonsense. Let's see one (1) evolutionist statement from Darwin, Dawkins, or Gould that says that the changes in species might have been due to divine intervention. Just one statement, with proper citations is all I ask for.

[HiTech RedNeck]

Evolution does not claim that no divine entites are involved in the shifting of alelle frequencies. It is also silent on the ultimate cause of environmental changes that may create selective pressures. As such, a "God" could be inserted into either of these variables (and other variables as well).

But that isn't how "science" is behaving in this matter. It is behaving as if everything can somehow be explained by natural laws plus nothing more. Any such "God" as you postulate, who is under such constraints, wouldn't be worthy of the name for all practical intents and purposes.