Replies

Now kindly tell me where in the above evolution allows for God. -me- Evolution does not claim that no divine entites are involved in the shifting of alelle frequencies.

Nonsense. Let's see one (1) evolutionist statement from Darwin, Dawkins, or Gould that says that the changes in species might have been due to divine intervention. Just one statement, with proper citations is all I ask for.

Let's see one (1) evolutionist statement from Darwin, Dawkins, or Gould that says that the changes in species might have been due to divine intervention. Just one statement, with proper citations is all I ask for.

I can't find anything in current gravitational theory that suggest that divine intervention might be involved, but I don't hear you yelling about it.

You claimed that evolution denied the interaction of a God. Now you're demanding that I prove that it explicitly offers divine intervention as an explanation. Not suggesting divine intervention is not the same as denying the possibility of divine intervention. Either you are incredibly stupid for making this error or you are incredibly dishonest suggesting it when you know better. Actually, you would still be incredibly stupid if you expected anyone else to fall for it.

I assert that evolution does not deny the possibility of divine intervention at any stage, even if it does not explicitly assert it as a possiblity. You claimed that evolution does deny the intervention of a God. The burden of proof is therefore on you to show where the theroy makes such an explicit denial. Stop shoving the burden of proof around when it's shown that you don't have a clue as to what you're talking about.

It is called science, you have heard of it right?

A scientific piece of evidence must be A: verifiable, B: repeatable, and C: falsifiable.

To say that Goddidit, would not be ANY of these things.

Science does not claim there is a god, nor claims there isn't one.

That is why it is called science, it is neutral on god.

Now if you wish to talk of something that asks that question, perhaps you should study philosophy.

Because it is obvious that science is beyond your comprehension, being the fanatical christian that you are.

And that is not a put down to christians or any others here, it is aimed soley at G3K.

yeah there ya go G3K.

We argued with you EVERY thread, proved boyond a doubt that you are clueless, then you start all over again on a different thread.

If you think that we are going to waste our time rearguing the same old garbage with you, then you're nuts, but actually I think that is what you are counting on, isn't is G3K?

We can only correct you so many times before we decide that you are a charlatan and a liar, And not here to debate but to toss your lies and false evidence into the mix for lurkers, and you have become something to be ignored, not dealt with.