[You:] To be honest, no, not any more interested than you'd be in discussing the evidence materialists ignore.
Lurkers, please note: evidence of transitional forms was posted back at post # 1169, in response to ALS's challenge in post # 1160, but, despite repeated invitations (e.g., posts # 1209, 1227, 1528), no anti-evolutionist has attempted a response. Instead, they talk about supposed "evidence materialists ignore" without citing any such evidence. (I am, in any event, no materialist; as I have repeatedly stated on these threads, I'm a theistic evolutionist.)
back to skrewl u go..
Ho Hum! I already answered your "evidence" in a previous post. Did you miss it? But I'm sure that won't keep you from asking again.
No, that is not evidence at all. Links are not evidence. Unnamed skulls are not evidence. If you have evidence, post it here. If you cannot bother cutting and pasting it so that we all can see it and discuss it then it is not worth anyone's bother.
The evolutionists are always 'linking' because they hope no one will look at the nonsense they are linking to and believe that their claims. Put your evidence here for all to see.