Right. It really helps that you don't have to do anything but assert this. This way, you can claim to be right without having to pony up any evidence.
You're intellectually bankrupt. Your position is completely without merit. You have no means of demonstrating that what you say is truth.
Does the evidence of nature, fairly considered, point to the reality of a Creator, an intelligent source for the immense information content of every living cell?
You appear to be operating on the assumption of naturalism. Science is, by definition, dedicated to producing naturalistic explanations for everything, explanations in terms of natural causes like physical law and chance, regardless of the evidence, so that one cannot ask the question, "Does the evidence point to something outside of nature?" because that question is forbidden.
Are you willing to acknowledge the intellectual duplicity of this position?
Right. It really helps that you don't have to do anything but assert this. This way, you can claim to be right without having to pony up any evidence.
You're intellectually bankrupt. Your position is completely without merit. You have no means of demonstrating that what you say is truth.
Perhaps this will help:
1. Some things undeniably exist.
2. My non-existence is possible.
3. Whatever has the possibility not to exist is currently caused to exist by another.
4. There cannot be an infinite regress of current causes of existence.
5. Therefore, a first uncaused cause of my current existence exists.
6. This uncaused cause must be infinite, unchanging, all-powerful, all-knowing, and all-perfect.
7. This infinitely perfect being is appropriately called "God".
8. Therefore, God exists.
9. This God who exists is identical to the God described in the Christian Scriptures.
10. Therefore, the God described in the Bible exists.