[Last Visible Dog]

We've come to the crux of LVD's argument. It has nothing to do with the viability of biological evolution as a theory, it's merely semantic wordplay on the word 'evolution'.

Nope. I just said "evolution as cosmology" was not a proven complete scientific theory - some other clowns said "cosmology has nothing to do with evolution" and tried to support this silly statement by saying evolution really only means biological. I have not changed my position one bit - the wordplay comes form the disrupters

[ThinkPlease]

Nope. I just said "evolution as cosmology" was not a proven complete scientific theory - some other clowns said "cosmology has nothing to do with evolution" and tried to support this silly statement by saying evolution really only means biological. I have not changed my position one bit - the wordplay comes form the disrupters

That dog don't hunt. I don't believe you said that until post #161(our fourth post on this thread), and not again until post #200--never mind that it's just awkward terminology anyway? Why not just say "Big Bang theory"?

[balrog666]

I just said "evolution as cosmology" was not a proven complete scientific theory -

Your statement is semantically equivalent to:

I just said "evolution as doughnuts" was not a proven complete scientific theory -

So, given your illogic and asinine attitude, buy a clue and crawl back under your rock like the cockroach that you emulate.