Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Last Visible Dog
Nope. I just said "evolution as cosmology" was not a proven complete scientific theory - some other clowns said "cosmology has nothing to do with evolution" and tried to support this silly statement by saying evolution really only means biological. I have not changed my position one bit - the wordplay comes form the disrupters

That dog don't hunt. I don't believe you said that until post #161(our fourth post on this thread), and not again until post #200--never mind that it's just awkward terminology anyway? Why not just say "Big Bang theory"?

534 posted on 05/12/2003 5:24:51 PM PDT by ThinkPlease (Fortune Favors the Bold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 528 | View Replies ]


To: ThinkPlease
That dog don't hunt. I don't believe you said that until post #161(our fourth post on this thread), and not again until post #200--never mind that it's just awkward terminology anyway? Why not just say "Big Bang theory"?

Says you. The twisters and distorted disparately tried to change what I was saying.

Evolution as Cosmology has no connection to the Big Bang Theory (unless you believe the Big Bang evolved (actually that is a big problem with evolution as cosmology). Evolution as cosmology is the theory that everything evolved (the cosmos, biology, everything) - no design, no cause. Problem is we have evidence that the universe started from a single cause making the foundation of evolution as cosmology either “something came from nothing” or “a miracle happened”

No more. No less.

544 posted on 05/12/2003 5:36:34 PM PDT by Last Visible Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 534 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson