Posted on 05/01/2003 2:41:23 PM PDT by Polycarp
Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why? (Click link for background.)
--Dr. Brian Kopp
Vice President, Catholic Family Association of America
5/1/03
A friend of mine is sitting in jail right now, having lived a life of severely self destructive behavior for many years. His current incarceration is for DUI.
From the time he was 13 to 15, he had a steady girlfriend, and was a quiet, well adjusted, normal kid.
At age 15 he was sexually molested by three male homosexuals, and in the process was introduced to drugs (need those whip its to open up a virginal anal sphincter, you know) and heavy alcohol abuse. He has lived a self destructive homosexual lifestyle ever since, a lifestyle induced by molestation and coerced drug and alcohol use at an early age.
I'm personally helping arrange his counseling and legal representation in the lawsuit against his homosexual molestors.
His life has been destroyed by these homosexual predators, yet many here and elsewhere have the unmitigated gall to castigate those of us battling this homosexual juggernaut, especially in regards to the efforts of the GOP to court the homosexual vote.
This type of predatory sexual abuse of young teenage boys is typical chickenhawking homosexual behavior. I've seen it so many times its enough to make me vomit.
And I guarantee if any of them ever touches one of my boys, there will be no trial, only a burial.
Furthermore, the credibility of my entire Church has been undermined by homosexuals who infiltrated its priesthood and systematically buggered its teenage altar boys for years.
And the same types who would criticize the Church for this buggering, also criticize the Church for being so "intolerant" of the homosexual agenda.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to this Republic and the institution of the family upon which all decent societies are built.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our children, as chickenhawking is an integral part of its culture. Homosexuals do not reproduce. They are not "born that way." But they do recruit. They are actively trying to recruit your children and mine.
The homosexual juggernaut presents a clear and present danger to our health system.
Mankind has spent several millenia developing effective and sanitary methods of disposing human waste.
Mankind knows that human waste is the source of deadly diseases.
Mankind knows that highly promiscuous sexual behavior of any kind brings with it high morbidity and mortality. Homosexual behavior is inherently promiscuous, as every single sociological study on the subject has repeatedly proven.
Male homosexual behavior is essentially desirous of methods to literally and figuratively swim upstream to the sources of that human waste, with as many different partners as humanly possible.
Therefore, homosexual behavior is deadly and definitely decreases the homosexual's life expectancy, and the visceral repulsion it engenders is a natural, wholesome, and common sense response.
Public health records demonstrate that homosexuals, representing 2 percent of America's population, suffer vastly disproportionate percentages of several of America's most serious STDs, with incidences among homosexuals of diseases like gonorrhea, syphilis, hepatitis A and B, cytomegalovirus, shigellosis, giardiasis, amoebic bowel disease and herpes far exceeding their presence in the general population. These are due to common homosexual practices that include fellatio, anilingus, digital stimulation of the rectum and ingestion of urine and feces.
An exhaustive study in The New England Journal of Medicine, medical literature's only study reporting on homosexuals who kept sexual "diaries," indicated the average homosexual ingests the fecal material of 23 different men each year. The same study indicated the number of annual sexual partners averaged nearly 100. Homosexuals averaged, per year, fellating 106 different men and swallowing 50 of their seminal ejaculations, and 72 penile penetrations of the anus. (Corey, L, and Holmes, K.K., "Sexual Transmission of Hepatitis A in Homosexual Men," New England Journal of Medicine, 1980, vol 302: 435-438; as quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).
A study by McKusick, et al., of 655 San Francisco homosexuals reported that only 24 percent of the sample claimed to have been "monogamous" during the past year, and of this 24 percent, 5 percent drank urine, 7 percent engag-ed in sex involving insertion of a fist in their rectums, 33 percent ingested feces, 53 percent swallowed semen and 59 percent received semen in their rectums in the month just previous to the survey ("AIDS and Sexual Behavior Reported by Homosexual Men in San Francisco," American Journal of Public Health, December 1985, 75: 493-496; quoted in "Homosexuality and Civil Rights," Tony Marco, 1992).
This is my answer to the question, "Even more posts on homosexuality...i'm curious as to why"
As long as this homosexual juggernaut looms over us, pro-family and all men of good will, desirous of defending and spreading the Culture of Life, will engage the battle and fight this integral and insidious piece of the Culture of Death.
Of course homosexuality is abnormal, what is it 1-4% of the population or some such? Now what?
That's fine. Just don't force me to accept clearly abnormal behavior as normal.
The weight of the PC liberal left wing conspiracy comes down like a ton of bricks on anyone who says that. And just witness the lack of "tolerance", by this same crew, of the kid who wore the "Straight Pride" shirt to school, the same school that was encouraging pink triangle-wearing, and shoving "homosexual lifestyle is normal" down all students' throats.
I rest my case.
Stick around I'm getting a list together of those who want to rape teenage homosexuals so the trauma will convert them to heterosexuality. Isn't that what the thread is all about?
I truly have great admiration for your judgment, sinkspur. But you said a couple days ago that you and your wife socialize with gays. The above statement seems inconsistent. Is there a special meaning to being "left alone"?
You just said that homosexuality was abnormal. What more needs to be said?
Yes. My friends talk about normal stuff; no attempts to promote a "lifestyle." I've got Baptist friends who don't ask me if I'm "saved" either, and I appreciate that.
If someone is asking you to embrace their sexuality, you come in contact with some strange people. In our area we don't embrace too many strangers and we only celebrate sexuality in our own bedroom. My neighbors haven't asked me to celebrate their sexuality..............yet.
Addressed what? The "average homosexual"? Since this study wasn't intendned to be OF the "average homosexual", and therefor no effort was made to define or find or even represent the "average homosexual", I'm not sure where you (or Kopp) even get the idea. Beyond the fact that you have some need to fill a propaganda quotient, that is.
This IS representative of the average.
Sorry, but no. No attempt was made in that regards. It was a study of the transmission vectors of Hep-A, not homosexuals.
And until you do a study disproving its findings, this study is the final statement on the matter to date.
And until you actually do a study of what you intend to prove, this particular study isn't the first, last, only, or even any statement on the "average homosexual".
It's not "exhaustive", it's not "average", and it's not applicable.
C'mon, give in, so we can move on to that garbage you're plagiarizing from Paul Cameron and IMAWHORE, or whatever it's going by.
Learn the terminology, or leave the debate!
What a mean thing to say.
I like it here.
Besides I'm having far too much fun dismantling your discombobulated arguments.
I have never claimed that mainstream homosexual advocates would admit most homosexuals are pedophiles. See my post to Trace for the difference, and the proper terminology.
Chickenhawking is homosexual molestation of teenage boys, or homosexual ephebophilia.
Pedophilia is any sexual abuse of any child under 12.
For all practicle purposes when it come to this debate this is a distinction without a difference. Your hair-splitting and nit-picking over the terms involved does not change the fact that your claim is simply wrong.
Mainstream homosexual advocates would not and do not admit most homosexuals are pedophiles or chickenhawks contrary to your claim.
If they did it would completely undermined their objectives and goals when it comes to gay rights and the acceptance of gays in society. Your claim is absurd.
Chickenhawking is an integral and accepted part of homosexual culture.
You don't know what you're talking about. The pursuit of sex with minors is something practiced and advocated by a fringe minority in the gay community...just as sex with minors is something a minority of heterosexuals are into.
You go to and find me evidence from gay culture..from gay communities, web sites and organizations and document your claim that sex with minors is an integral part of the gay community.
The fact is you can't..because you are wrong.
Again, do more research on the subject at hand before you attempt to correct me.
I already have. The statement by GLAAD... condemning the very activities you claim are accepted and mainstream in gay culture.
Or are you claiming to speak for gays more so than the #1 organization of gays in America?
I don't think so.
But a list of links to long reading assignments? I don't think so.
I'm willing to bet I've read more of these sort of articles than most people on these boards.
But nowhere have I read any serious claims that sex with minors and pedophilia are normal accepted parts of mainstream homosexual society.
The article posted on this thread is full of nonsense and ignorant gay stereotypes. It is an embarrassment to all credible critics of the gay rights movement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.