Time to take out the trash.
Posted on 04/07/2003 9:26:14 AM PDT by Jael
HIV-Positive Teacher Charged With Having Sex With Student Posted: 11:50 a.m. EDT April 7, 2003
PATERSON, N.J. --
An HIV-positive teacher from a Roman Catholic elementary school is accused of sexually assaulting a former student over a two-month period, prosecutors said.
Raymond J. Welsh, 33, of Fair Lawn, was charged with sexual assault by a diseased person, aggravated sexual assault, sexual assault and child endangerment. He was released Friday on $200,000 bail.
Joseph Del Russo, chief assistant prosecutor for Passaic County, said state law requires anyone infected with HIV to notify sexual partners.
[since the child was in about the 6th grade when all this started, I hardly see how this homosexual was "having sex." Why can't these people call this what it is? Rape.]
Welsh has taught religion, music, computers and gym at St. Therese School in Paterson since the late 1990s.
Deal with your own straw man. I was talking about your “generalization” generalizations.
For example, the whole "no more than 2% of male adults are homosexual" bit. Do we really need to disprove that yet again?
If you want to call anyone who's ever had sexual relations with a member of the same sex a "homosexual", then we need to see numbers that reflect that definition.
Good Job!
Isn’t that Kinsey psychobabble? The pathology is same-sex attraction, if you got it you be “gay.”
Actually, no -- it seems to be yours.
Kinsey said nothing of the sort -- he broke it down into 6 degress of sexual behavior, ranging from exclusively homosexual to exclusively heterosexual. If you want to use his numbers and your definition, then 37% of the adult male population is gay.
If that is true why the HELL do they have such a powerful lobby?
Why are we having a lifestyle that 98% of us have no interest in continually rammed down our throats?
Time to take out the trash.
That’s reflected in many studies, including the Alan Guttmacher Institute studies.
The problem you homosexuals have is even if you use the debunked Kinsey figure you guys are still many times more likey to molest children. You should rethink your behavior, it’s a gateway to other perversions.
Not by your definition. And by "your", I also include the sources you're ashamed to admit using.
Kinsey supports ~2% number, by an accurate definition.
If you no longer have same-sex attraction (usually after therapy), you no longer are homosexual. It’s pretty simple.
Kinsey said nothing of the sort -- he broke it down into 6 degress of sexual behavior, ranging from exclusively homosexual to exclusively heterosexual.
Ah yess…the old degrees of perversion created by homosexual pedophile Kinsey and a bunch of prison inmates. Exclusive or part time is irrelevant, if it’s an ongoing condition it’s pathology. Get it?
If you want to use his numbers and your definition, then 37% of the adult male population is gay.
That would be funny if it wasn’t such a desperate attempt to justify your perversion. Common sense Josh, stop trying to see more than what is in front of your eyes.
| Homosexual Agenda Index |
| Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search |
| All FreeRepublic Bump Lists |
I’m not ashamed to admit where I found the links to the SCIENTIFIC STUDIES, it’s a compilation from dadi, TVA and AFA I think.
Kinsey supports ~2% number, by an accurate definition.
Well good then, what’s the problem? You pick a number and your pathology is still many times more likely to go on to pedophilia and other paraphilic disorders. Get some help for goodness sake, this stuff just doesn’t go away.
Oh. So there are no ex-gays. Interesting. (Even Exodus' "success" stories admit the attractions don't entirely go away.)
Ah yess…the old degrees of perversion created by homosexual pedophile Kinsey and a bunch of prison inmates. Exclusive or part time is irrelevant, if it’s an ongoing condition it’s pathology. Get it?
If you say so. You brought him up.
That would be funny if it wasn’t such a desperate attempt to justify your perversion. Common sense Josh, stop trying to see more than what is in front of your eyes.
Again: you brought him up. And you're defining the term. Rather badly, I must add. The numbers, by your definition, don't lie.
Money. High IQ. Sympathetic bleeding-heart liberals looking for a cause. A deep sense to justify their perversion.
So, nothing peer-reviewed, just the ramblings of a bunch of political action committees.
I suppose you believe in global warming and second-hand smoke, too? Partial-birth abortions "for the health of the mother"?
Not for ALL.
However acting on those attractions is another matter. Coveting and conduct are two different things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.