"This line of cases establishes the general proposition that a juror may not be challenged for cause based on his views about capital punishment unless those views would prevent or substantially impair the performance of his duties as a juror in accordance with his instructions and his oath. The State may insist however, that jurors will consider and decide the facts impartially and conscientiously apply the law as charged by the court." -- Adams v. Texas, 448 U.S. 38 (1980)
Admit it, you didn't read the decision, did you? If you had, you wouldn't have made such an uninformed comment.
You err in assuming at least a modicum of integrity and honesty. If at first glance it appears to support the status quo it's useful and can be taken out of context no mater how deceptive or dishonest. A blatant and obvious modus operandi, I might add. Ever time a person does it they further discredit themselves. You're responding to, and I'm referring to, the very bottom of the barrel.