I read your post up until this astoundingly ignorant line, then decided it wasn't worth answering if the rest of your "facts" matched the statement above. You know that frogs weren't around when vertebrates transferred to land, just as you knew man had not descended from mice -- another ignorant statement you made earlier (we shan't mention your "chimps have tails" error of a few months back). Until you can show a modicum of understanding of the theory you rail against, you will be on my virtual ignore list.
Frogs are not amphibians? Amphibians are not supposedly among the first terrestrial animals? You better read the garbage put out by your own side. They have been around for hundreds of millions of years:
Native New Zealand frogs (genus Leiopelma) are among the rarest frogs in the world. They are the living representatives of the most ancient lineage of frogs, closely resembling frogs that lived 200 million years ago.
From: Behavior and Biology of Native Frogs.
So as you see, my statement is correct about the doubletalk of evolutionists. When it fits their agenda evolution goes on all the time, when it does not species remain the same for hundreds of millions of years. as when they make selective DNA comparisons.