Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Junior
read your post up until this astoundingly ignorant line, then decided it wasn't worth answering if the rest of your "facts" matched the statement above.

Frogs are not amphibians? Amphibians are not supposedly among the first terrestrial animals? You better read the garbage put out by your own side. They have been around for hundreds of millions of years:

Native New Zealand frogs (genus Leiopelma) are among the rarest frogs in the world. They are the living representatives of the most ancient lineage of frogs, closely resembling frogs that lived 200 million years ago.
From: Behavior and Biology of Native Frogs.

So as you see, my statement is correct about the doubletalk of evolutionists. When it fits their agenda evolution goes on all the time, when it does not species remain the same for hundreds of millions of years. as when they make selective DNA comparisons.

708 posted on 03/17/2003 5:01:34 AM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
... frogs that lived 200 million years ago.

Younger than many of the dinosaurs. Creation Science is the science of creatively misunderstanding real science and tiling together lying mosaic pictures from real quotes.

712 posted on 03/17/2003 5:51:43 AM PST by VadeRetro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies ]

To: gore3000
Frogs are not amphibians?

Yes all frogs are amphibians, but not all amphibians are frogs. That you cannot discern the difference just reinforces my view that you are a complete moron.

713 posted on 03/17/2003 6:12:08 AM PST by Junior (Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 708 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson