The vast majority of XXY males do not produce enough sperm to allow them to become fathers. ...Man! You evoabsolutists sure are a snotty bunch!
Yes. I read your first sentence, and now I'm quoting it back to you. Okay? I think my questions to you were polite and I assure you that they were genuinely intended to understand and learn more about your point.
Your mighty first sentence implies that some of the XXY males do become fathers. Is that true? Do you have any references that you could provide?
I also asked what XXY meant. I asked you if this is a chromosome triplet rather than a pair. But you ignored the question. Maybe this time instead of some attack upon me, you will deign to answer my questions?
ML/NJ
However, no XXY male should automatically assume he is infertile without further testing. In a very small number of cases, XXY males have been able to father children.
That was a direct response to your original question. It took some time with internet searches to find the reference, and I provided a link to the reference. I had hoped you would at least read the part I quoted before flying off the handle.
There's also post #327 that responds to your question.
That makes two clearly worded answers to you question about chromosome count that you haven't read. Not noticing the word "beyond" makes three. This is not snottiness. It's a simple request for the courtesy of reading before flying off the handle.
As for your question about terminology, I can't answer. But I assure you that if you did a google search on chromosome count you could find the answer. That's the way I find stuff.