[MrLeRoy]

Mr Robinson isn't closely associating himslf on a personal level with known tokers and dopers either, therefore, he has no worry about warrants being served.

He's followed your advice to jimt, yet he still opposes the things jimt opposes; ergo your advice to jimt was irrelevant to his concerns.

[_Jim]

He's followed your advice ... [but]

I think you've wandered off into the theortical, hypothetical weeds now ... I don't presently have a cold, but I hate detest cols and also being opposed to the propagation of 'colds' -

- by your logic I should *not* have that viewpoint since my ox is not immediatly getting gored by a 'cold' ... this is not entirely logical on your part.

Mr Robinson can still oppose no-knock warrants and roadside searches on behalf of all those that warrant no-knock warrants and road-side searches for the reason of their "personal habits and lifestyles".