To: jimt
And these are the tactics that I am opposed to. Whether or not the people of a state vote to legalize drugs is no concern of mine. I would vote no if it comes up on my ballot. However, I am adamantly opposed to swat raids, no knock warrants, illegal searches, illegal phone taps, violations of privacy, roadblocks, asset forfeiture, etc., etc.
53 posted on
02/28/2003 1:04:00 PM PST by
Jim Robinson
(Save the Constitution. Dump a Democrat!)
To: Jim Robinson
However, I am adamantly opposed to swat raids, no knock warrants, illegal searches, illegal phone taps, violations of privacy, roadblocks, asset forfeiture, etc., etc. Exactly. I don't care a great deal if pot itself is legal or not. I do care that the government acts within Constitutional bounds, which they are clearing unwilling to do in the WOD. If a law can only be enforced via a police state, then the law is wrong.
To: Jim Robinson
Whether or not the people of a state vote to legalize drugs is no concern of mine. I would vote no if it comes up on my ballot. However, I am adamantly opposed to swat raids, no knock warrants, illegal searches, illegal phone taps, violations of privacy, roadblocks, asset forfeiture, etc., etcAs am I but that is not good enough for the true believers. They want a strong central government tht would forbid your state from enacting drug and pornography laws.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson