[metacognative]

If that was funny, maybe it wouldn't sound so ignorant. Creation 'science has many interesting evidences for a young earth. If they were easy to refute, they would be refuted instead of banned by the Established Religion of Darwinites.

[jennyp]

If that was funny, maybe it wouldn't sound so ignorant. Creation 'science has many interesting evidences for a young earth. If they were easy to refute, they would be refuted instead of banned by the Established Religion of Darwinites.

Please recite for us the evidences for a young earth that you find most convincing.

[Ichneumon]

Creation 'science has many interesting evidences for a young earth.

*snicker*. Yes it does have many, but they're hardly "scientific".

If they were easy to refute, they would be refuted

Been there, done that.

instead of banned by the Established Religion of Darwinites.

They're not being "banned" -- spew twaddle all you want (I find it entertaining, I'd hate to outlaw it), but we are certainly going to draw the line at being forced to teach such silliness in classrooms as if it deserved serious consideration.

But just for fun, give us you *best* "interesting evidence" for a young earth, and we'll show you why it hardly deserves to be uttered in the same breath as the word "science".