To: discostu
I just need to see some solid proof before I jump to conclusions...I would hope that everyone would. I wouldn't want some of you on my jury...I'd have to be the 'perfect' everything for you to even consider giving me a fair trial!
69 posted on
02/09/2003 5:35:22 AM PST by
Sungirl
(>^..^<)
To: Sungirl
I just need to see some solid proof before I jump to conclusions...I would hope that everyone would. I wouldn't want some of you on my jury Probably what makes this so complicated for you is the parents are knowingly allowing their rugrats to hang with him in the first place.It would take an adult to physically catch him in the act or have it captured on a hidden camera.That would be impossible for that to happen because nobody could get through his security apparatus.From what my wife told me from watching the show,even the FBI and police has to have an appointment to come on the premisses.Only in California.I personally feel that he's molesting them,he has Chester the Molester written all over his face.His obsession with kids is a good indicater,especially the teen white boys.We may never have any physical evidence if there's no penetration involved.
To: Sungirl
Solid proof is that the kid could and did identify a birthmark on the underside of Jackson's penis. There is no other event except molestation that accounts for that child knowing about that small and not visible from a casual glance birthmark.
Which is why Jackson paid the big bucks. He knew he was busted.
76 posted on
02/09/2003 7:23:58 AM PST by
Jael
To: Sungirl
The solid proof comes from Jacko's own mouth. Check what the kid said. What struck me the most was that warning flags went up LONG before we got to behavior that's outside Jacko's norm. Normal people don't spend 3 hours talking to somebody else's kid about video games on transcontinental long distance. And yet we KNOW, because Jacko's proudly declares it, that he invites children to sleep overs and "shares his bed" with them.
You wouldn't have to be perfect, but you would have to NOT go on at length about how much you love sleeping with children. Child molestors don't deserve fair trials, to steal a line from Heavy Metal: hanging's too good for them.
83 posted on
02/09/2003 11:12:25 AM PST by
discostu
(This tag intentionally left blank)
To: Sungirl
I wouldn't want some of you on my juryWhen do you go on trial?
You certainly seem to be "trial ballooning" your case here on FR.
Stay safe; stay armed.
Eaker Freeper Status
101 posted on
02/09/2003 5:26:11 PM PST by
Eaker
(64,999,987 firearm owners killed no one yesterday. Somehow, it didn't make the news.)
To: Sungirl
And here you admit even if you had solid proof you still would have to jump to conclusions , speaking of jury duty .
Be gone with you malcontent .
To: Sungirl
I'd have to be the 'perfect' everything for you to even consider giving me a fair trial! No, we would just look at the facts and stop listening to your words.
143 posted on
02/11/2003 6:56:15 AM PST by
Terriergal
("If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning"CSLewis)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson