Replies

I've showed you where he's admitted it. The behavior he professes to, the behavior he suggests everyone try (which is is itself part of the admission, check NAMBLA's website), is an exact match of all of the warning signs and methods. If somebody has admitted to having feathers, a beak, webbed toes, being comfortable both in the air and on water and enjoying a diet of fish I have no trouble calling them a duck. Jacko has admitted to being obsessed with children, to developing childish relationships with children, to lavishing them with gifts, to having them sleep both in his and in his bed; thus I call him a child molestor, and so should you.

You're not on the fence, you're in deliberate denial. You're ignoring the evidence put before. You continue to obsess on the kid and even to accuse the kid (my what a standard rape defense tactic, accuse the accused, next you'll be saying he wore provacative clothing to entice Jacko). None of what I've put forth revolves around Chandler, it all comes straight from Jacko. You're damn right I don't like him, I don't like child molestors. There were three basic reactions when the Chandler story first broke: suprise, lack of suprise, and suprise it took so long. I was in the last group, it had been obvious to me for quite a while that Jacko was a molestor. I can't even say the Chandler story confirmed my suspicions because Jacko himself had done that long before. Jacko's victims are starting to reach the age of admission, late 20s to early 30s are when most victims "come out" (which is one of the reasons molestors have such long careers, it's very rare a victim will aknowledge what's happened until adulthood). In the next 5 to 10 years there's going to be so much more evidence even you won't be able to ignore it.