Normally I would agree.
however, this British chap got every single detail correct except the name of the Lake (Indian Lake, not India Lake.) He did his homework.
I have heard these same exact details about the white plane from locals from day one.
This account of locally known facts is accurate. The conclusion might be incorrect, but the fact there was another lowflying aircraft present at the time of the crash is irrefutable. It is a consistent story heard from day one.
He sure did. He *only* presents a select set of 'facts' and NOT the entire story.
You peple are so d*mned easy to fool - because you're *not* technically oriented, have very short memories and even shorter attention spans!!!
DO YOU recall how many people heard made PHONE CALLS from the GTE Aifones on the backs of the seats that day?
DO YOU remember all those husbands and wives who lost their loved ones they had just talked to via those GTE Airfones were interviewed numerous times by the networks on national TV?
Remmeber?
Those same kin ALSO had a chance and ACCEPTED an invitation to HEAR the cockpit tapes.
There were NO DOUBTS in their minds that UA93 crashed after a struggle in the cockpit.