Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: donh
So abandoning the notion of a single common ancestor is just a minor glitch in the Darwinian agenda.

Is this abandonment representative of evolution theory in general? Has it been challenged over time and accepted by the scientific community?

833 posted on 12/18/2002 8:07:32 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
Is this abandonment representative of evolution theory in general? Has it been challenged over time and accepted by the scientific community?

The Tree of Life was officially revised in 2000. The current tree shows chronological overlaps that are impossible if life had one single common ancestor. This has not sunk in universally as yet, but most working micro-biological palentologists now accept it. Since it is based on DNA mutation distance calculations for ribosomes, it will be very hard to mount a challenge at this point. We don't revise the root of the Tree of Life on a whim.

880 posted on 12/19/2002 1:11:14 PM PST by donh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 833 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson