By the accounts I've read, Lysenkoism was a manifestation of antiscience that grew out of evolutionist thinking. Stalin became an atheist through reading Darwin. His interest was power, and he put Dawinism into practice throuhg his slaughter of weaker folk.
But what's your point? These political and emotional subjects have no bearing on the reliability of theories. I don't have a problem with your stating the obvious.
Interesting to note, however, that many scientists who adhere to creationist theories do so secretly for fear of losing their jobs. Is it the part of real science to keep the door of other possibilities shut?
Evidence for this claim?
Ocelot to Platypus! Ocelot to Platypus!
Darwin Central integrity compromised. Worldwide cabal threatened by security breach. Stranglehold on science in jeopardy.
Alert code chartruse.