[Fester Chugabrew]

"To say that ALL creationists do this, or ALL evolutionists do that is ridiculous and you know it.

I must admit my comment was overreaching with respect to the bigger argument, but it was addressed to a specific individual who seems to think creationism is prima facie non-science, non-intellectual, etc. In fact I would venture to say it is a recurring theme around here.

[edsheppa]

creationism is prima facie non-science, non-intellectual,

Clearly it is not non-intellectual but it is definitely non-science, at least as it is practiced by those intellectuals.

[f.Christian]

FC...

a recurring theme around here.


2589 posted on 01/03/2003 2:19 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew

fC...

power/lies abhor a vacuum---

overflowing around here!

[Aric2000]

I must admit my comment was overreaching with respect to the bigger argument, but it was addressed to a specific individual who seems to think creationism is prima facie non-science, non-intellectual, etc. In fact I would venture to say it is a recurring theme around here.

But creationism is Nonscience, non-intellectual.

You read it in a book, a book that claims to have been written by men who were shown what to write by god.

That is the ONLY proof that you have of creationism. it is indeed, Non-scientific/non-intellectual. Anyone can read the book and think they know all the answers. But to look at science and what it has found and to try to understand it, takes work, very intellectual and VERY scientific.

To say the bible is the truth is fine in religion, but not in science.