[Fester Chugabrew]

". . . peer-reviewed papers . . ."

As in the kind of "peer review" that meets the ideological approval of you and your closed band of colleagues?

[Condorman]

As in the kind of "peer review" that meets the ideological approval of you and your closed band of colleagues?

Have you ever even SEEN a peer-reviewed journal? Because, if not, I suspect your sources are leading you astray again. I posed this question to gore3000 back in post 1372.

In the absence of peer-reviewed journals, how should scientific knowledge, discoveries, and information be verified and disseminated?

[Doctor Stochastic]

Peer review is not ideological. If you can write a coherent paper, it will be accepted. It's not that hard. If you are just not good enough, keep trying.