Insofar as you claim to present an accurate historical assessment of Christianity, absolutely. Your words do not mean squat if you do not know what the Christian faith entails.
Furthermore, truth is indeed dependent on the source. There's no "misapprehending" about it. And you are sorely mistaken if you think I am laboring under any difficulty here.
Either the events I described took place, or they did not. Don't take my word for it - go and see for yourself.
Furthermore, truth is indeed dependent on the source.
Oh, well. I thought you were objecting to evolution. Now I see that you have bigger fish to fry, and that you wish to deny the existence of objective truth. My mistake.