The guy's got some perceptual problems. He noted (#1769) that:
My own two cents here. According to our present knowledge, whatever may have existed before the BB -- if anything -- was crushed to plasma;
Maybe you should offer to tell him how old the world is after he explains how anything could be "crushed to plasma", frozen into a gas, melted into a solid, or anything else like that.
I have several reasons for not doing so - and you just gave me another one!
First of all, the whole intent of the question is to both distract from discussion of evolution and to start an attack on religion. I see no reason to indulge him in that.
Second of all, the question is irrelevant to the discussion and certainly to all my posts. In general I use the assumptions of evolution to show its contradictions and how even under its own assumptions it does not work. I cannot waste my time on irrelevant discussions.
Thirdly, his insistence, post after post about it shows him to be a thug, so he is discrediting himself, not me when he makes this statement. Further, because his minions go along with him and make the same statements, it shows everyone who the hyenas of evolution are and how they run in packs like all thugs.
However, the most important reason for my not answering is that it gives me a legitimate reason to repost the questions which the evolutionists have been avoiding for some 900 posts on this thread which show evolution to be totally false. If he was not so arrogant, he would see he is only harming his side by this, but then I have never accused him or any evolutionist of being a mental giant.