[Fester Chugabrew]

"You said the designer theory is logical. What is that logic?

Logic is for constructing proofs, which give us reliable confirmation of the truth of the proven proposition. I thought you were not asking me for proof. Why ask so many times for that which I cannot give? You're the one playing games, pal. You and your friends haven proven very good at it.

But please point out to me what is illogical in assuming that - for one small example - GRAVITY has a design and purpose? You've avoided this one small example thus far. More games?

[Condorman]

But please point out to me what is illogical in assuming that - for one small example - GRAVITY has a design and purpose?

I know of no evidence to support such an assumption. Do you?

[Condorman]

Logic is for constructing proofs, which give us reliable confirmation of the truth of the proven proposition. I thought you were not asking me for proof. Why ask so many times for that which I cannot give?

You are the one claiming that intelligent design is logical. All I'm asking for is evidence to support your position.

Hardly unreasonable.