Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Sentis
Hmm so out of the 6,000,000,000 humans on earth there are only .01 percent of difference and for all the chimps on Earth there is a 1.5 percent difference.

Wrong again. As I have shown in post# 1172, science now says the difference is 5% or 150 million DNA base pair difference. Also note that the differences between humans are so small and so inconsequential such as eye color, hair color, skin color, etc. that they have no relevance to anything meaningful (except to racists which evolutionists certainly are).

1,237 posted on 12/28/2002 8:33:50 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1180 | View Replies ]


To: gore3000
Also note that the differences between humans are so small and so inconsequential such as eye color, hair color, skin color, etc. that they have no relevance to anything meaningful (except to racists which evolutionists certainly are).

Again, you are a hypocrite. You get so strung up on any attack made upon you yet you have the audacity to say that all evolutionists are racists.

As to other responses you have had to me, I follow your argument and respond with my opinions. You claim that I "need a course in reading comprehension". This is something you often do. You say (paraphrasing)"and anybody who goes back and reads through our conversation would know that you are an idiot, and I am a genius." You know full well that nobody is going to go through and read all of that, so you think you win.

This is a summary on what exchanged between us:

1. You said that the universe has too many variable set in just the right way for the conditions on earth to sustain life. Therefore, there must be a creator.

2. I said that arguing about the improbability of something occurring after the fact is moot. I asked you to pick up a rock, and after you did I was amazed at how you picked up that one rock. Out of all the rocks in the world, you picked up that one rock. It is a improbability of astronomical proportions. But what good is that? I am arguing about the improbability of random events after the fact. It does us no good.

3. Then you said that it is different because a rock is just a rock, and has no purpose or specificity.

4. I said that I can make a rock have purpose and specificity. A sharp one can help me crack a nut or kill an animal.

5. Then you bring in a statment about the difference between artwork and rocks. How artwork is about invoking a feeling and impressing somebody. Now remember gore, this whole argument is about debating the improbability of something (rocks or universes) after the fact. So I make the connection that you are saying that the universe (like a piece of art) is not random and has been designed to invoke a feeling or impress somebody.

Read back through it if you must, this is quite obvious. I am not going to let you say "you need a reading comprehension course" without making you own up to your lies here.

Now I could be wrong, I am nothing but a dumb, racist evolutionist.

1,271 posted on 12/29/2002 1:33:09 AM PST by B. Rabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson