To: fortheDeclaration
It was a response to your statement...
***Beside the fact that only one translation I found (NRS) translated it as the 'begotten' as the perfect (has been), every other translation translated it as is (NASb, NIV, KJV, Geneva,) ***
My point is that is is indeed a perfect despite your observation of translations. If temporal give some indication of the amount of time that may intervene.
Place these terms in sequence and indicate whether the sequence is logical temporal or both. justification, regeneration and faith.
To: fortheDeclaration
Ignore previous post (cut and paste placement error).
It was a response to your statement...
***Beside the fact that only one translation I found (NRS) translated it as the 'begotten' as the perfect (has been), every other translation translated it as is (NASb, NIV, KJV, Geneva,) ***
My point is that is is indeed a perfect despite your observation of translations.
Place these terms in sequence and indicate whether the sequence is logical temporal or both. justification, regeneration and faith. If temporal give some indication of the amount of time that may intervene.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson