To: xzins; Bat_Chemist
In this case, the shoe fits.
Xzins does retreat to eschatology when he is getting pinned down on his free choice musings.
I like Xzins, but this ploy is fairly transparent. He complains of repetition on the grace threads.... AS IF this topic hasn't been thrashed over the past two months on FR.
24 posted on
11/14/2002 1:50:07 PM PST by
drstevej
To: drstevej; Bat_Chemist
two months
That's hysterical, Steve. I've been on these religion threads for about a year and a half. I didn't notice an endtimes thread until "two months" ago.
For the remainder of that 1.5 years we discussed the "God decreed everything....Oh no he didn't" subject. Calvin/Arminian.
Why don't I call THAT transparent? It's just absurd, and all I can do is shrug my shoulders and sigh in your direction.
27 posted on
11/14/2002 1:55:41 PM PST by
xzins
To: drstevej
Is the problem here a lack of agreement on the definition of the term "bound"? If you define bound as "unable to do anything affecting any human being or activity", obviously he isn't. OTOH if you define it as "limited by the sovereign will of God from doing whatever he wants", he is. He had to get permission to attack Job, and he still has to get permission to attack us. He is still "god's devil."
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson