I will say in your favor, as far as I've seen, you have never threatened bodily harm to anyone on these threads. Nor have you "taken up the Cross" to give yourself an air of spiritual superiority.
This is kind of a back of the hand compliment for you from lakey here. She's telling you you're not very bright about this case, but you're not as bad as Sherlock. Congratultions, you're coming up with the 'logic free' folks!
Gee, two out of three ain't bad! What you consider "slamming others" is consistantly pointing out wild-eyed theories without any supporting facts, pointing out flaws in logic and common sense, and taking posters to task for smearing the victims in this case without any evidence whatsoever. A perfect example is a post claiming something was amiss because Ed always wore beige slacks at press conferences. How lame is that? (Never mind that the preponderence of men's slacks in any men's store are beige.)