Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
Constituional rights supercede any signed agreement.

I agree with that as a general proposition. What you are likely to find in this situation, however, is that a court would say the university had a right to reasonably inspect the rooms for unsafe conditions and material and that the students, warned in advance of this right of inspection, (a) had no expectation of privacy, and (b) had consented to the searches.

39 posted on 09/23/2002 2:16:05 PM PDT by blau993
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: blau993
While you raise a valid premise, I don't think it stands up. For instance, candles are considered contraband. So the school says they are inspecting for candles. How does that hold up when some students smoke and a very clear combustable source is ignored. I don't think they could make the case for a valid inspection.

If they are searching for weapons or some other contraband, they need a warrant.

Landlords can perform a reasonable inspection of apartments, but they can't inspect drawers or personal belongings. I don't see why this school setting should be different.

41 posted on 09/23/2002 2:30:53 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson