Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Roscoe
Backwards. They didn't.

They rejected the proposal for inclusion before the voters due to a a technical mistake made in the wording of the proposal itself. It had nothing to do with what the proposal itself was about, unless you can prove otherwise.
363 posted on 09/13/2002 9:39:49 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 360 | View Replies ]


To: WyldKard
They rejected the proposal for inclusion before the voters due to a a technical mistake made in the wording of the proposal itself.

Yes.

It had nothing to do with what the proposal itself was about, unless you can prove otherwise.

When have I ever said otherwise? Your straw man just fell down.

366 posted on 09/13/2002 9:42:45 AM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson