[Roscoe]

They rejected the proposal for inclusion before the voters due to a a technical mistake made in the wording of the proposal itself.

Yes.

It had nothing to do with what the proposal itself was about, unless you can prove otherwise.

When have I ever said otherwise? Your straw man just fell down.

[WyldKard]

When have I ever said otherwise? Your straw man just fell down

You were implyin that the judges had a different reason for doing it. So either I misunderstood, or you are reversing yourself.

I will try to assume the best, and chalk it up to a simple misunderstanding. I offer apology if I misunderstood you.