Posted on 09/10/2002 8:32:22 PM PDT by Hillary's Lovely Legs
CBS' Scott Pelley isn't the first person to observe that in a world of grays, President Bush sees mainly black and white.
But Pelley says there are aspects about the Bush's personality that might surprise some people during Bush's only TV interview this Sept. 11 anniversary week - on 60 Minutes II Wednesday at 8 p.m. ET/PT.
"There are times in the interview where he is pounding the desk, he's so angry," Pelley said Monday. "There are parts where tears are running down his face as he's describing the people (he) met in New York. Viewers are going to see a man who has a great deal more range of emotion that he betrays in public."
But they'll also see Bush repeating a familiar refrain: "He sees this (the war on terrorism) as a struggle between good an evil and he sees America as the leading champion of good in the world, with a responsibility to put an end to this evil wherever it is - way beyond Afghanistan."
Pelley spent 2 1/2 hours with Bush, speaking to him aboard Air Force One and at the White House. Pelley said Bush gets "a little testy. But I think he has fun with it: He likes the give and take."
Pelley also talked to 20 other Bush administration officials about their recollections of Sept. 11 and ensuing days.
But Pelley devotes a full 40 minutes of the show to examining what happened in the hours immediately after the attacks, when Bush remained largely aboard Air Force One instead of returning to the White House - a controversial move that Pelley came away thinking was justified.
By the end of the day it was Bush who overruled the Secret Service and ordered Air Force One to return to the the capital. "He said, 'Tell my wife to meet me at the White House' - and they did."
Pelley said that Bush is a bit like President Reagan - he paints the big picture but expects others to figure out the nitty-gritty - but someone who, in this case, needed to talk about the days that changed history.
"He was very engaged and thrilled to talk about it," Pelley said. "It was almost as if it seemed he needed to get it off his chest. He wanted to tell somebody about that week and what has been going through his mind."
I suppose you think your sneaky by implying that I prefer the child murdering former AG Reno? Well, you end up looking vapid again.
Silly fringer ... get yourself a cat-o'-ninetails, instead of using threads to gratify your masochistic yearnings .
Wasn't implying. Your rhetoric says it all.
I prefer Toyotas to Fords based upon my experience of owning both. Is that sincere enough for you? Oh, and your graphic isn't working. :-)
RINO.
Gullible.
Anymore you all can think of this late at night?
Such hubris; such blatant hypocracy !
And, I shoulda figured you still would be incapable of getting it right. There I go overestimating people again.
Well, aren't YOU the dreamer!
They spend so much time and energy being "different" and "individual" and "real thinkers" that they ALL look and sound the same!
I just went through JR's "Find in Forum" page. I had to hold my nose. Boy's pilin' it up there.
If there's a gunfight, he runs in with his penknife and starts poking and jabbing.
Yeah, all two of us. The picture-lickers are a touchy bunch, indeed. Perhaps it's dawning on them that, from a distance, they look just like the Klintonista Koolaid Brigade - in love with a professional politician's carefully-constructed image.
Meanwhile, government growth and intrusion proceeds merrily onward.
Well, DEAR, I am fully aware of what the acronym stands for. That is why I used it. It is meant to identify the left wing pragmatists who have hijacked the Republican party and are using it to advance their liberal agenda. I used it because it fit.
Shouldn't that word be displays rather than betrays in public?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.