Posted on 08/29/2002 1:00:30 PM PDT by feelin_poorly
Tell me who this is and what two great things he did. Then you'll know what a true winner is.
~grin~
That's good enough for me for now. Every statement he's made or his administration, he's been able to back it up. Bush has a whole lot of folks feelin_poorly lately. If you can't beat him...
Of course not. But you are willing to concede, I hope, that ideas are definitely not judged "good or bad" based on the pronouncements of people who think they are (but they aren't) experts on Constitutional law and their subjective divining of what the Founding Fathers would or would not approve?
That being said, in all fairness, I am happy with the way the Bush Administration is handling the situation with Iraq--we need to take that guy out. I believe that the majority of Americans would support an invasion upon Iraq.
Where have I advocated anything other than that they should be working WITHIN the bounds laid forth in the Constitution? Sure, some people may not WANT to face up to the facts of why what happened, happened. That's not my problem (directly, anyway). If our Country is to be at 'war' with ANYONE, I want it to be done according to the guidelines set forth in our Founding documents. So far, this hasn't been done and everyone in DC, with a notable couple of exceptions, is perfoming an end-run around the US Constitution that they SWORE to defend. We are NOT 'AT WAR' as only Congress has that power and they declined. I'm sick of judges legislating from the bench and I'm sick of lawyers and other subversives deciding that our Constitution was written on rubber instead of paper. The moral tenats of our Founding have NOT changed, only people's perceptions of same. Are you perhaps acquainted with the episode involving the Barbary Pirates and our DECLARED war on same?
If it's made up mostly of people like you, I think I'd rather not.
I don't know what "fihy" means. It's not in the dictionary.
Any answer I give as to wether or not I believe OBL "did it" has no bearing on this discussion. Your question is a Red Herring. The article is about the policies of the Bush Administration. The article is not about Harry Browne. So, try refuting something from the article.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.